Gas prices: Will more drilling bring them down?
Gas hit $4 a gallon in some parts of the country. Is the high price here to stay?
Gas hit $4 a gallon in some parts of the country this week, said Henry Payne in NationalReview.com, and “it’s the president’s fault.” That may seem a rather simplistic charge, given the complexity of the global oil market, but it’s the same one the Democratic Party used against President Bush when gas hit the $4 mark in May 2008. And since President Obama is “the most anti-carbon president in U.S. history,” blaming him for soaring gas prices actually has some merit. This is, after all, a president who went “on record supporting higher gas prices” as a way of curbing global warming, and who has consistently “aligned himself with green extremists” in blocking the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada and efforts to drill for new sources of oil here in the U.S. Many Americans agree that Obama is to blame, said Major Garrett in NationalJournal.com. Some polls show Obama’s approval rating plunging by 5 to 10 points in recent weeks. Not surprisingly, the Republican candidates vying to replace him have jumped on the issue, with Newt Gingrich promising $2.50-a-gallon gas if elected. “Make no mistake”—the rising price of gasoline could cost Obama the presidency.
It’s ridiculous to think that presidents control gas prices, said Robert Semple in The New York Times. As Republicans were quick to point out when gas prices spiked to $4 a gallon under President Bush, the cost of a barrel of oil is determined by global, not domestic, commodities markets. Prices are high at the moment because of the ongoing surge in demand from the developing world, particularly China and India; a looming European embargo on Iranian oil; and the threat of war with Iran, which could seriously disrupt oil shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. During Obama’s presidency, said Dana Milbank in The Washington Post, domestic oil production actually increased by 13 percent, while imported oil dropped to 45 percent of total consumption—down from 60 percent in 2005. But “the facts don’t matter” to Republicans, who are desperate for an issue to run on now that the economic recovery is gaining strength.
“Yes, of course presidents have no direct control over gas prices,” said Charles Krauthammer, also in the Post. But the pain at the pump is helping focus the voters’ attention on Obama’s “rigid, fatuous, fantasy-driven energy policy.” He continues to block drilling off the mid-Atlantic coast, off Florida, in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and on federal lands in the Rockies, while wasting taxpayer dollars promoting solar boondoggles like Solyndra and a laughable project to get energy out of algae. Obama thinks fossil fuels are evil and outdated, and is thus “utterly unserious about the real world of oil in which the rest of us live.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sorry to spoil your argument, said Michael Klare in MotherJones​.com, but in the real world of oil, prices are headed up—regardless of who’s in the White House. The demand from China and India is only going to grow in coming years, and as the former CEO of Chevron put it, “the era of easy oil is over.” The planet still has huge reserves of petroleum, but they’re miles under the sea, in the Arctic, buried in shale or tar sands, and in other hard-to-reach locations. Extracting it will be environmentally destructive, accelerate global warming—and cost a lot of money. Oil companies will pass that cost on to consumers. No matter how much drilling occurs in the U.S., “high gas prices are here to stay.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published