Is Netanyahu manipulating Obama?
What was the point of this week’s meeting between Israeli and U.S. leaders?
What was the point of this week’s meeting between Israeli and U.S. leaders? asked Akiva Eldar in the Tel Aviv Ha’aretz. It’s not as if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was going to hear anything from President Obama that he hadn’t heard already from his own advisers and from top U.S. officials. Obama simply reiterated that an Israeli attack on Iran before the U.S. presidential election in November would be “tantamount to attacking the incumbent president.” And Obama probably told Netanyahu that he would be “prepared to pay generously” for a “time-out”—presumably by ignoring the festering Palestinian issue.
But this is not some political game, said The Jerusalem Post in an editorial. Netanyahu’s decisions about Iran are based on considerations of Israel’s security, just as Obama is driven by concerns about U.S. security. American pundits on the Left say that Obama is bowing to Israeli pressure with his tough talk on Iran, while those on the Right say that he is just pretending to be hawkish to woo Jewish voters. But the truth is that Obama gets it. He knows that a nuclear Iran is “a cardinal threat to essential U.S. interests.” And he agrees with the Israeli prime minister that the two countries should use all means, including military ones, to prevent Iran from becoming nuclear. The only major difference between them is the timetable: Obama is willing to wait longer to see if sanctions work.
That’s the crux of the problem, said Ron Ben-Yishai in the Tel Aviv Yedioth Ahronoth. Obama says he won’t let Iran possess nuclear weapons—but Israel says that “defining the red line this way would in fact enable the Iranians to become a nuclear power.” If Iran is allowed to develop the ability to produce lots of highly enriched uranium, it will be able to build a bomb within six months whenever it feels like it. The U.S. won’t be able to prevent that because, “as opposed to uranium enrichment, the development of the actual weapon can be hidden relatively easily.” Remember, the Americans didn’t know it when India, for instance, built its first bombs—the telltale sign in that case was a test nuclear explosion. So the crucial question is whether Netanyahu persuaded Obama on this point.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
This isn’t a matter of persuasion, said Sefi Rachlevsky in Ha’aretz. Netanyahu’s plan is to “drag the United States into war.” Iran already has a fortified underground enrichment complex, at Fordo. No Israeli strike can wipe that out, so if Israel attacks Iran unilaterally, all it can do is delay the nuclear program. In the aftermath, “a revenge-hungry Iran” will redouble its efforts and go nuclear within two years. The U.S. knows this, too. An Israeli strike, then, is meant to “compel Obama to send the only military force capable of destroying Iran’s nuclear program.” Such a war would be disastrous. Our only hope is that Israel’s generals and retired generals “make it clear to Netanyahu that it can’t be done his way. You don’t gamble Israel’s security on conspiracies.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published