Abortion: Defining fertilized eggs as ‘persons’
On November 8, Mississippi voters will decide whether a fertilized human egg should be considered a legal person.
“Could destroying a one-celled organism make you a murderer?” asked the Newark, N.J., Star-Ledger in an editorial. Mississippi voters will get to answer that question on Nov. 8, when they vote on a “personhood amendment” to the state’s constitution. If the amendment is passed, a fertilized human egg would be considered a legal person in Mississippi—“and any action that destroys one could be viewed as murder.” That means all abortions would be illegal, even in the case of rape and incest or a pregnancy that places the mother’s life in danger. The legal ramifications don’t stop there, said the San Jose Mercury News. Birth control methods that prevent fertilized eggs from implanting in the uterus, such as IUDs and morning-after pills, would also be illegal. And there’d be no more in vitro fertilization, since many eggs are fertilized and destroyed in that process. Mississippi is on the brink of returning to the “Dark Ages.”
Don’t listen to these “baseless rumors,” said Dr. D. Eric Webb in the Hattiesburg, Miss., American. If this life-saving amendment passes, women will still be able to use most hormonal birth control pills, “which have never been proven to cause abortion.” As for ectopic and other pregnancies that might threaten a mother’s life, “the legal principles of self-defense” will adequately protect women and physicians from prosecution. So why are pro-choice activists making these “cruel and misleading assertions”? asked Donald Wildmon in the Pascagoula Mississippi Press. It’s simple. Abortion providers like Planned Parenthood profit from the legalized killing of fetuses. So it’s in their interest to deny unborn babies a constitutional protection we all take for granted: “the right not to be murdered.”
The battle over legal abortion is now entering a new chapter, said Irin Carmon in Salon​.com. Mississippi is “the most conservative state in the nation,” and the amendment is likely to pass. Pro-life activists are trying to get “personhood” amendments on the ballots in Ohio, South Dakota, and Florida in 2012. When several states define embryos as persons, the movement will try to overturn Roe v. Wade. If you think the U.S. Supreme Court won’t go that far, consider this: Justice Harry Blackmun, author of the Roe decision, noted during the 1973 hearing that the basis for legal abortion would “collapse” if “this suggestion of personhood is established.” That’s the pro-life movement’s ultimate goal, and Mississippi will be the first step.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The rise in unregulated pregnancy scansUnder The Radar Industry body says some private scan clinics offer dangerously misleading advice
-
Democrats seek 2026 inspiration from special election routsIN THE SPOTLIGHT High-profile wins are helping a party demoralized by Trump’s reelection regain momentum
-
Film reviews: ‘Bugonia,’ ‘The Mastermind,’ and ‘Nouvelle Vague’feature A kidnapped CEO might only appear to be human, an amateurish art heist goes sideways, and Jean-Luc Godard’s ‘Breathless’ gets a lively homage
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration