How to fix the housing mess

This approach would cost about $350 billion, but it “will be even costlier to do nothing,” said Martin S. Feldstein at The New York Times.

Martin S. Feldstein

The New York Times

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

The government could reduce the mortgage principal on underwater homes to 110 percent of a home’s value. The government would absorb half the cost of the voluntary reduction, and the bank the other half. In exchange, the borrower would accept that his non-housing assets could be seized if he defaulted on the reduced mortgage payments. This approach would cost about $350 billion, but it “will be even costlier to do nothing.” Just as we wouldn’t allow a forest fire that threatens a neighborhood to burn out naturally, we can’t let housing prices continue to fall and make “the economy weaker and the loss of jobs much greater.”

Explore More