Obama and 'the great speech kerfuffle': 5 lessons
While the economy sputters, Washington fixates on the speech-scheduling spat between John Boehner and President Obama
President Obama and Republicans played a high-profile game of chicken this week, after the White House scheduled the president's much-hyped address on jobs on the same night as a long-planned Republican presidential debate. House Speaker John Boehner asked Obama to postpone the speech to a joint session of Congress by one day. The president agreed, only to find that the new time, on Sept. 8, coincided with the kickoff for the NFL's new season. What lessons should we take from "the great speech kerfuffle of 2011"? Here are five:
1. Obama is a wimp
"It was foolish of the White House" to schedule Obama's address at the same time as the debate in the first place, says Michael Tomasky at The Daily Beast. But Obama's "capitulation" to Boehner just makes him look weak. And the rumor is that Obama's jobs plan will be "pretty modest" to boot. It makes you wonder whether Obama will ever stand up and fight for anything.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
2. The GOP doesn't respect Obama
This might be "the first time in history" that a House speaker has turned down a president's request to appear before a joint session of Congress, says Liz Marlantes at The Christian Science Monitor. That just "provides the president’s supporters with yet another piece of evidence that he is not being treated with the deference due (and typically given) the President of the United States."
3. Both parties are as petty as everyone suspected
"Let's be clear — this was not a news story," says Mo Elleithee, a Democratic strategist, as quoted by Politico. "This was scheduling silliness." People don't care whether Obama's speech coincides with the debate or the football game — they want both parties to work together to create jobs. This kind of "political pettiness" makes both sides look terrible, and it explains why everybody in Washington is looking at record low approval ratings.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
4. Democrats should be worried
"If this was an attempt to make Republicans look unreasonable, then, in almost every conceivable way, it failed spectacularly," says James Downie at The Washington Post. Even if Obama's original ploy had worked, giving the speech during the GOP debate would only have ensured that fewer people heard it, and that analysts would have paid more attention to "the theatrics" than the message. "If this is a preview of Obama’s re-election campaign, Democrats should be very worried."
5. Football could be a mightier foe than the GOP
The White House rolled the dice when it decided to go up against the Republican Party, says Lucy Madison at CBS News, but it wouldn't dare try to upstage professional football's season opener. Obama will deliver his speech at 7 p.m. ET (just 4 p.m. on the west coast) to avoid stepping on the 8:30 p.m. kickoff. Squaring off against the GOP is one thing, but the NFL is another matter entirely.
-
Why Britain is struggling to stop the ransomware cyberattacksThe Explainer New business models have greatly lowered barriers to entry for criminal hackers
-
Greene’s rebellion: a Maga hardliner turns against TrumpIn the Spotlight The Georgia congresswoman’s independent streak has ‘not gone unnoticed’ by the president
-
Crossword: October 26, 2025The Week's daily crossword puzzle
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to goThe Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'