With liberals still irate over President Obama's chronic caving to Republicans during Washington's debt-ceiling crisis, pesky questions have resurfaced. On Friday's Real Time with Bill Maher, the politically-incorrect pundit asked his panel, "Do you think people on the Left are having buyers' remorse about the president?" — and the question, finetuned with a focus on Hillary Clinton as the erstwhile Obama alternative, has since inspired plenty of commentary. Should Democrats have picked Clinton instead?
Many liberals think Hillary wouldn't have caved: In recent days, says Leslie Bennetts at The Daily Beast, the whispers about Obama's failings have "swelled to an angry chorus of frustration." The Democratic Party's liberal stalwarts are furious "about Obama's perceived weakness," and "heartbroken at how ineffectual he seemed in dealing with Republican opponents over the debt ceiling." Many are "particularly incensed" by Obama's "capitulation to conservatives on fundamental liberal principles." They believe Hillary would have stood firm.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
And now, arguably, Hillary is the Dems' best hope in 2012: Clinton warned voters in 2008 about the danger of being duped by Obama's rhetoric and the perils of having such an inexperienced leader, says Matthew Dickinson at Presidential Power. Now we have an unpopular president "mired deep in the political muck of Washington...." The best solution: Hillary should run in 2012. Sure, "a contested nomination would be a nasty, brutish spectacle," but the still-popular Clinton, who had no involvement with Obama's unpopular domestic record, has far fewer liabilities than her struggling boss.
"An open letter to Madam Secretary: Run, Hillary, run!"
Not so fast: It's hardly a sure thing that Clinton would have avoided Obama's missteps, says Joan Walsh at Salon. Sure, she would have known from the start "the extent to which the right wing would go to sabotage a Democratic president." But a Hillary presidency also risked becoming a "dreaded sequel to the ugly Clinton Wars," full of "90s-style partisan warfare." And remember, "it's not Obama's fault that the Tea Party took over the GOP."