The next debt fight: Will the GOP cave on taxes to prevent defense cuts?
When a congressional "super committee" hammers out the debt deal's spending cuts, the Pentagon's budget could be the crux of the drama

Under the debt deal signed into law this week, automatic across-the-board spending cuts — including $500 billion slashed from the Defense Department — will be triggered if a bipartisan "super committee" can't agree this fall on a plan to cut $1.5 trillion from the deficit. The Democrats' great hope going into this autumn's talks: That Republicans, presumably anxious to preserve the military budget, may accept tax increases as part of that deficit-reduction plan, even though they've refused to budge on taxes to date. A key factor: A growing schism among Republicans. Will the GOP's defense hawks overpower Tea Party fiscal hawks, and give in on taxes to save the Pentagon?
Republicans will have no choice: "I'm optimistic Republicans will defend defense funding," says Tina Korbe at Hot Air, "but that means they'll have to sacrifice taxes." The Democrats would rather stomach automatic cuts to domestic spending than agree to another deal without tax hikes. That means the GOP is likely to "cave on tax hikes" to avoid a deadlock that would undermine our military. That's a shame, in a way, since defense spending isn't the real inflator of our ballooning deficits. Entitlements like Medicare are. That's where the cuts should come.
"Defense Secretary warns against defense cuts to come"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The GOP should stand firm: Republicans on the super committee should "call the President's/Democrats' bluff on tax increases," says Keith Hennessey at Reuters. Democrats will be "just as desperate" to avoid spending cuts to their favored programs as the GOP will be to protect the Pentagon. And if history is any guide, it's the Democrats who will blink first. Obama and Co. caved in December 2010 when it was time to extend the Bush tax cuts. They caved during the government shutdown fight this spring. And they caved on the debt ceiling this summer. They'll cave again, and the Pentagon will be spared — without tax hikes.
"Political strategy in the Budget Control Act era"
Sorry, Pentagon. But neither side will give in this time: "I hope folks are ready to live with those triggers included in the deal," says Steve Benen at Washington Monthly, because there's almost no chance the super committee will approve anything acceptable to the House, Senate, and President Obama. Republicans were "so irresponsible during the debt-ceiling fight" that you'd have to be delusional to expect them to compromise on taxes, even to save the Pentagon. Democrats' backs are against the wall, and they have to play hardball now. Get ready for deadlock.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Do smartphone bans in schools work?
The Explainer Trials in UK, New Zealand, France and the US found prohibition may be only part of the solution
-
Doom: The Dark Ages – an 'exhilarating' prequel
The Week Recommends Legendary shooter adds new combat options from timed parries to melee attacks and a 'particularly satisfying' shield charge
-
7 US cities to explore on a microtrip
The Week Recommends Not enough vacation days? No problem.
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy