Bin Laden fallout: Is Obama slighting Bush?
As the president who finally killed bin Laden, Obama is facing accusations that he's not sharing adequate credit with his predecessor, George W. Bush

Theories abound on why George W. Bush, declined an invitation to join Obama at a solemn wreath-laying ceremony at Ground Zero on Thursday. Among them: The notion, put forth by a source close to Bush cited in the New York Daily News, that the former president feels Obama has taken too much credit for catching Osama bin Laden. "Obama gave no credit whatsoever to the intelligence infrastructure the Bush administration set up," the source said. "It rubbed Bush the wrong way." Valid point, or just sour grapes?
Obama is hogging all the glory: From the moment President Obama appeared on TV to announce that commandos had killed bin Laden, says Victor Davis Hanson at National Review, he has been saying, "I" did this, and "I" did that. He is completely ignoring the fact that "the protocols for taking out Osama bin Laden were all established by President Bush and all opposed by Senator and then candidate Obama." What hypocrisy.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Right just wants to excuse Bush's mistakes: "The Right will stop at nothing to steal President Obama's thunder," says Jeff Schweitzer at The Huffington Post. They're just trying to inflate Bush's role and diminish Obama's to suggest that Bush's use of torture during terrorist interrogations worked. But the key information that led to the courier who led to bin Laden didn't emerge until long after we had given up on waterboarding. Conservatives should stop trying "to rewrite history to justify the unjustifiable."
"The twisted logic of torture envy"
Sharing credit is not too much to ask: It takes "a truly small man to ignore the real visionaries" who paved the way for him, says Dr. Milton R. Wolf in The Washington Times. We reached the moon when Richard Nixon was president, but nobody would deny that Nixon was merely following John F. Kennedy's vision. And it's just as obvious that, while Obama was in office when we got bin Laden, it was George W. Bush who had the vision for the hunt. The least Obama could do is show Bush a little more gratitude.
"Obama got bin Laden just like Nixon reached the moon"
If Bush deserves credit, so do other past presidents: If we're going to lavish praise on Bush for Obama's accomplishment, says Al Kamen at The Washington Post, why stop there? Bill Clinton fired missiles at bin Laden in 1998 and started the early CIA operation tracking him. And it was JFK who, in 1962, established the SEAL teams that got Osama. And FDR gave us the precursor to the CIA. "We're pretty sure Millard Fillmore had a hand in all this, too, but we're still checking that out."
"The most important moment in American history involved ... Bush?"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Do smartphone bans in schools work?
The Explainer Trials in UK, New Zealand, France and the US found prohibition may be only part of the solution
-
Doom: The Dark Ages – an 'exhilarating' prequel
The Week Recommends Legendary shooter adds new combat options from timed parries to melee attacks and a 'particularly satisfying' shield charge
-
7 US cities to explore on a microtrip
The Week Recommends Not enough vacation days? No problem.
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy