Obama's deficit reduction speech: First reactions
The president announces plans to cut $4 trillion from the deficit over the next 12 years, with a combination of spending cuts and tax increases. Is this winning the future?
On Wednesday afternoon, the president announced a proposal to reduce the projected U.S. deficit by $4 trillion over the next 12 years, with a combination of spending cuts and targeted tax increases. (Watch an excerpt here.) Obama's plan would slash $750 billion in discretionary spending, save $500 billion by reducing health care waste, and raise revenue by letting the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans expire. The president also said that if budget targets weren't met by 2014, a "debt fail-safe" would kick in, forcing even greater spending cuts. Obama labeled the Republican plan proposed by Rep. Paul Ryan a "vision of our future that's deeply pessimistic." In contrast, he said, his plan would enable Americans to "live within our means while still investing in our future." Here, some initial reactions to the president's speech:
It was a passionate defense of liberal values: Obama's speech was an "unapologetic defense of a progressive vision of government," says Steve Benen at Washington Monthly, and included a welcome, "full-throated condemnation" of Ryan's irresponsible plan. Some liberals worry that Obama is afraid to defend "the institutions of the modern welfare state," like Medicare and Medicaid, which Ryan's proposal would radically change. But Obama reminded Americans that the modern welfare state is "worthy of a spirited defense." It was exactly what we needed to hear.
"A spirited defense of a progressive vision"
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
It was a whole load of nothing: Obama was content to attack "the only viable debt-reduction plan out there," says Jennifer Rubin at The Washington Post, instead of offering any substantive solutions of his own. No "Social Security fix," no "alternative to top-down rationing of Medicare," no details on how to reform the corporate tax code. Instead, all we got was "more defense cuts and taxes on the rich." Well, that won't solve our problems — nor will it help Obama in 2012.
"The president speaks, says very little"
It wisely aimed for the political center: This was "classic Obama," says Andrew Sullivan at The Daily Beast, offering a "center-left approach" to the "center-right conviction" that painful solutions are required to tackle the debt. He wisely noted the GOP's refusal to "ask anything from the top one percent." "After the cold shock of the Ryan plan," Obama's "less draconian vision" will surely swing the political center back in his direction.
"Live-blogging Obama's moment of fiscal truth"
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
It was about winning in 2012, not winning the future: The speech sounded "more like the opening salvo of a political campaign" than a bipartisan proposal, says Doug Mataconis at Outside the Beltway. Obama's attack on the Bush tax cuts for the rich was a "purely political move," and his decision to go after Ryan's plan is "clearly making the bet that the American public doesn't want to give up the federal government they've become used to." This wasn't about solving a problem; this was about "laying the groundwork for 2012."
-
Wellness retreats to reset your gut healthThe Week Recommends These swanky spots claim to help reset your gut microbiome through specially tailored nutrition plans and treatments
-
Climate change could lead to a reptile ‘sexpocalypse’Under the radar The gender gap has hit the animal kingdom
-
7 hotels known for impeccable serviceThe Week Recommends Your wish is their command
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred