Japan's earthquake: A case for more U.S. government spending?

The House GOP budget would defund the tsunami warning center that alerted West Coasters to danger last week. Is it time to reconsider the spending cuts?

California's Seal Beach Pier was closed by authorities after a tsunami warning, the sort of weather alarms the proposed GOP budget would cut.
(Image credit: Getty)

The West Coast tsunami warnings that followed Japan's massive earthquake on Friday ignited a debate on what had been a little-discussed element of Congress' spending plan. The House Republican budget cuts would hit hard at the National Weather Service's Pacific Tsunami Warning Center, which sounded the alarm. The GOP budget also aims to cut humanitarian and foreign aid. Is this an area where we're spending too much, or is the devastation in Japan a reminder that disaster preparedness is costly, but worth it?

Spending on disaster preparedness saves lives: The budget-cutters seem to think that "all government agencies are wasteful or can be easily privatized," says Brian Smith at Earth Justice. But it's easy for those of us "living at sea-level on the Pacific Rim" to understand now that there are some "essential services" that should not be put on the chopping block. Be "grateful for advance warning systems." There's wisdom in paying for them.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up