Arizona shootings: Should prosecutors seek the death penalty?

Federal lawyers must decide whether to seek capital punishment for alleged shooter Jared Lee Loughner if he's convicted

Jared Loughner's initial indictment was for attempted murder; potential first-degree murder charges are still pending.
(Image credit: Corbis)

Last week, federal prosecutors formally filed charges against Jared Lee Loughner, the alleged gunman in Tucson's deadly Jan. 8 shooting rampage. So far, however, Loughner has only been charged with the attempted murders of the shooting's survivors, including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. Before lawyers can formally accuse Loughner of shooting the six victims who died, the United States Attorney's office in Tucson and the Justice Department in Washington must decide whether to ask jurors to impose the death penalty if Loughner is convicted. Is the ultimate penalty clearly warranted in this case, or should prosecutors seek a life sentence? (Watch a report about Loughner's fate)

The Tucson shooter deserves death: This massacre was a "monstrous act of evil," says Bryan Fischer at Rightly Concerned, and it cries out for biblical justice. The ancient civil code of Israel called for swift execution for murder. That's the only fitting punishment when so much "innocent blood" has been shed.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up