Swiss dog tax: Pay it or your pet dies
A small town in the pacifist country has stirred up controversy by threatening to kill dogs if their owners don't fork over $48.50 a year
A village in Switzerland is taking heat after its municipal council threatened to kill dogs whose owners fail to pay a $48.50 yearly tax. The Associated Press reports that an official in Reconvilier, 100 miles from Geneva, is dredging up a century-old bylaw that allows the civic government to do just that. Unsurprisingly, pet lovers are up in arms about the draconian law, and the town is facing criticism from all corners. Here's a brief guide to the controversy:
Does the town's government really have this authority?
Technically, yes. Pierre-Alain Némitz, the official who runs the council, cited a 1904 law that allows officials leeway to kill dogs as a last resort for collecting unpaid taxes. Némitz went further, penning an editorial for a Swiss newspaper in which he notes that, as recently as the 1960s, Reconvilier dealt with troublesome dogs in a brutally straightforward fashion: "We took them to a knacker's yard, shot them in the head, and it was done." (He clarified his comments in a follow-up article, insisting that the town's police force isn't even armed, and that "this isn't about exterminating all the little doggies!")
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Why would the town want to enact the 1904 law?
It is attempting to collect unpaid back taxes, and has identified pet owners who haven't paid the dog tax in years. Add it all up, and it's "not an inconsequential sum for a burgh whose population includes 280 dogs among 2,245 people," says Bruce Crumley at Time.
How extreme has the reaction been?
Very. Némitz said "he's been overwhelmed by insults and threats" since the edict began to generate publicity last week. Meanwhile, blogs have lit up with criticism of the law's cruelty — and effectiveness. "Threatening the lives of companion animals over a $50 fee isn't the way to solve budget problems," says Stephanie Feldstein at Change.com. "It's also far more effective at damaging community relations than it is at convincing people to register their pets."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Sources: Time, Change.com, Associated Press, NPR
-
Mary Poppins tour: 'humdinger' of a show kicks off at Bristol Hippodrome
The Week Recommends Stefanie Jones and Jack Chambers are 'true triple threats' as Mary and Bert in 'timeless' production
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
Jaguar's stalled rebrand
In the spotlight Critics and car lovers are baffled by the luxury car company's 'complete reset'
By Abby Wilson Published
-
What the chancellor's pension megafund plans mean for your money
Rachel Reeves wants pension schemes to merge and back UK infrastructure – but is it putting your money at risk?
By Marc Shoffman, The Week UK Published