Health care reform: Is repealing it worth $230 billion?
A congressional agency says the GOP proposal to scrap the Affordable Care Act would add to the deficit. So are Republicans being hypocritical by pushing for repeal?

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported Thursday that repealing health care reform would add $230 billion to the federal deficit over the next decade, intensifying debate over House Republicans' bid to scrap the law. Democrats seized on the figures to argue that the GOP cares more about partisan politics than fiscal discipline. The new House speaker, John Boehner (R-Ohio), questioned the accounting and countered that replacing "the Washington Democrats' job-killing health care law" with "common-sense reforms" is ultimately the best way to reduce costs, and the deficit. Who's right? (Watch Rep. Steve King debate heath care reform)
This exposes Republican hypocrisy: If the GOP succeeds in repealing the Affordable Care Act, says Joan McCarter in Daily Kos, we'll pay "more for less." With the law, 94 percent of the population will have health coverage; without it, that figure drops to 83 percent, and we get stuck with a big bill in the bargain. Instead of facing facts, Republicans are exempting the repeal bill from their own budget rules that require any increase in spending to be offset by other cuts. It all proves "they care more about making petty political points than reducing the deficit."
"CBO: Health reform repeal would add $230 billion to deficit by 2021"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Actually, repeal would save us a fortune: Repealing "Obamacare" is definitely "the fiscally responsible thing to do," says Joseph Lawler in The American Spectator. The law "increases government health care spending by (very roughly) $900 billion" — it just offsets the cost with tax hikes and cuts elsewhere. The government should be using those offsets to cut the deficit — "not to finance more entitlement spending."
"Repeal and fiscal responsibility"
These numbers aren't as firm as they sound: Republicans still have "wiggle room," says Dave Weigel on Slate because these programs always, always, always cost more than anticipated." But this certainly has given Democrats an opening to "scorch Republicans" by accusing them of trying to "blow up the deficit." As usual, the reality is "a bit more complicated" than either side seems willing to admit.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Book reviews: 'Clint: The Man and the Movies' and 'What Is Wrong With Men: Patriarchy, the Crisis of Masculinity, and How (Of Course) Michael Douglas Films Explain Everything'
Feature A deep dive on Clint Eastwood and how Michael Douglas' roles reflect a shift in masculinity
-
Recreation or addiction? Military base slot machines rake in millions.
Under the Radar There are several thousand slot machines on military bases
-
How is AI reshaping the economy?
Today's Big Question Big Tech is now 'propping up the US economy'
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardon
Talking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidents
The Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: which party are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event