Why Democrats didn't sack Pelosi

Nancy Pelosi won her bid for House minority leader, beating a challenge from a Blue Dog Democrat ... and perplexing many pundits

Nancy Pelosi won the minority leader position for the next Congress by more than 100 votes.
(Image credit: Getty)

Outgoing Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) beat back a challenge from "Blue Dog" Rep. Heath Shuler (D-N.C.), 150–43, to emerge as House Democrats' choice for minority leader in the next Congress. Though she won by a wide margin, the tally was still seen as a sign that many in the caucus are uncomfortable with her leadership. Given Pelosi's unpopularity nationally, and the "shellacking" her caucus just endured, why didn't Democrats pick a new public face for the party? (Watch a Fox News discussion about Pelosi's re-election)

They need her experience: Pelosi "has a great deal of work to do to rebuild the confidence of her caucus," says John Nichols in The Nation. But she won a "sufficient mandate" to lead because "she has the skills" and "generally well-regarded political instincts" to be an effective minority leader, again. That's the reason House Democrats chose her 10 years ago, and it still applies.

"Pelosi easily retains leadership post; now she must lead"

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.


Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Democrats are masochistic and delusional: After the House Democrats' drubbing, keeping Pelosi on is "an act of electoral self-wounding that calls for psychiatric intervention," says Clive Crook in The Atlantic. If they chose her because they think her ideas are right, that would be somewhat "admirable." But they seem to think Americans agree with them, and that "calls into question [their] sanity," and their seriousness about winning back the majority.

"On Nancy Pelosi and Michael Foot"

There was no one else to choose: Keeping an "unpopular leader" may seem like a "self-defeating move" from "a public relations perspective," say Jonathan Allen and John F. Harris in Politico. And maybe it is. But House Democrats want a strong fighter sticking up for their interests, especially to the Obama White House, and no credible challenger stepped up. Whether you love Pelosi or hate her, when it comes to fundraising and corralling votes, "she's got game."

"Why Dems don't dump Pelosi"

To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us