Will Gawker's tell-all smear help Christine O'Donnell?

Pundits have condemned the gossip website Gawker for running a first-person account of a "one-night stand" with O'Donnell. Can she profit from the outrage?

In less than one full day, the website Gawker received more than 600,000 pageviews on its Christine O'Donnell "one-night stand" post.
(Image credit: Screen shot/ Gawker.com)

In an unusually divided election season, the website Gawker has united virtually everyone by publishing an anonymous first-person account of an alcohol-fed "one-night stand" with Delaware GOP Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell. What is it about this tawdry tale of a three-year-old, not-quite-sexual encounter that has conservatives, liberals, feminists, and all manner of journalists up in arms — and could it boost O'Donnell's flagging Senate campaign?

This smear backfired: Gawker's "accomplished quite a feat," says Tracy Clark-Flory in Salon. Since its "piggish" tell-all didn't even attempt to shed light on "her politics or character," O'Donnell critics like me now have to defend her. Whatever Gawker or its anonymous "ass" of a writer intended, the story only "makes her an immensely more relatable and sympathetic character."

"Gawker's Christine O'Donnell tell-all backfires"

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.


Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

The story merely confirms that train-wreck campaigns are irresistible: O'Donnell's "third-base hookups" obviously don't matter, says Jessica Coen at Gawker sister site Jezebel. But Gawker got 500,000+ page views with its "faux-scandalous tale" because we "media-consuming, web-browsing, gossip-loving masses" already think of O'Donnell as our sex-talking, "charmingly clueless 'friend,'" and "any little detail" is catnip.

"Why you care about Christine O'Donnell getting to third base"

Voters should send a message: Gawker's "repugnant" smear only "made me feel sorry for Christine O'Donnell," says Walter Shapiro at AOL News. My "naive hope" is that this kind of bottom-feeding will shock us into civility. And hey, if South Carolina's Nikki Haley can become governor after two "public accusations of infidelity," maybe Delaware voters will "remember that they are better than the scandal-mongers at Gawker think they are."

"Ugly Gawker story turns [O'Donnell] into a victim"

O'Donnell, own your sexuality: Any sympathy benefits from the story won't help O'Donnell overcome her 18-point deficit in the polls, says Rachael Larimore in Slate. I'd advise her to "use your last minutes in the spotlight to stand up for yourself," like Virginia Democrat Krystal Ball did after Gawker ran compromisingly "sexy" photos of her. If O'Donnell says, "Yeah, I had a few drinks and tried to pick up a man. So what?," then Gawker looks "silly for running such a non-story."

"Advice for Christine O'Donnell: Channel Krystal Ball"

To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us