Ken Buck: Being gay is 'like alcoholism'

Colorado's GOP Senate hopeful is getting heat for his awkward analogy. Does this validate Democrats' charge that he's a fringy Tea Partier?  

Tea Party favorite Ken Buck backtracks after comparing being gay to alcoholism.
(Image credit: Getty)

Ken Buck, the Republican challenger to Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO), is facing a backlash for declaring — in a nationally televised debate with Bennet — that, although "birth has an influence" on sexual orientation as with "alcoholism," homosexuality is a choice. (Watch the video below.) Post-debate, the Tea Party favorite said that he didn't mean to talk "about being gay as a disease." In a tight race focused on economic issues, will Buck's misstep on a hot-button social issue make a difference?

This exposes Buck for the "right-wing nut" he is: This is far from Buck's first "extremist" position in the race, says Steve Benen in Washington Monthly. In any normal election year, comparing homosexuality to alcoholism, "dispassionately, as if this were a routine thing to say" would mark Buck as a "cartoonish right-wing nut, and the subject of national ridicule."

"Buck compares homosexuality to alcoholism"

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.


Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

This is a non-story: The question, from NBC's David Gregory, clearly left Buck "surprised and uncomfortable," says Jon Ward in The Daily Caller. And no wonder: Social issues are "nowhere near the top of the list" of Colorado voters' concerns this year. So why did sexual preference come up? Blame Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett, who riled up "liberal bloggers" last week by calling homosexuality a "lifestyle choice."

"Sexual orientation makes surprise appearance..."

The fallout could go either way: Buck should have just said the issue of homosexuality "should not be a matter of federal concern," says B. Daniel Blatt at Gay Patriot. "But, alas he did not." That may end up hurting him with the crucial "fiscally conservative/socially liberal voters in the Denver suburbs" — unless his rival Bennet overplays this and "dwells on the issue," which may remind voters that the economy is their major concern.

"Does Ken Buck really believe being gay is a choice?"

To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us