Issue of the week: Trade brinkmanship with China
Will the U.S. slap punitive tariffs on goods imported from China?
Who says bipartisanship is dead? said Zachary Karabell in Huffingtonpost.com. The House of Representatives last week came together in an overwhelming majority, voting 348–79 to approve a bill empowering U.S. trade authorities to slap punitive tariffs on a wide range of goods imported from China. China is illegally subsidizing those goods, according to the bill, by holding down the value of its currency, the renminbi, thus making Chinese exports cheap while raising the price of its imports. The legislation assumes “a direct line between China, its currency, its exports of lower-cost goods to the United States, and the erosion of middle-class life” and high unemployment in the U.S. What nonsense. “U.S. manufacturing has been bleeding jobs” and middle-class living standards have been slipping since the 1970s, long before China grew into an economic force. And the current job shortage results largely from the woes of the construction, housing, and auto industries, not from Chinese trade policy. Fortunately, with the Senate opposed, the House’s expression of “emotion, anger, and frustration” stands no chance of becoming law.
The House’s “impotent fury” is damaging nonetheless, said Bill Frezza in RealClearMarkets.com, because it raises the specter of a destructive “global trade war.” The Great Depression, don’t forget, took hold after Congress slapped 60 percent tariffs on imports. Our trading partners followed suit, international trade dried up, and misery ensued. Even without a trade war, high tariffs on Chinese goods would hurt poor and unemployed Americans by “doubling the price of every item at Wal-Mart.” How can “raising the price of the products we buy from China” create manufacturing jobs in the U.S.? said National Review Online in an editorial. If U.S. tariffs managed to take any low-skilled, low-cost jobs from China, they’d reappear in Thailand or Vietnam, not in America. Congress also forgets that if the U.S. imposes tariffs, the Chinese might stop “lending us our own money back.” That would send interest rates soaring, ushering in a severe recession.
Trade negotiations with the Chinese are just smoke and mirrors without “the threat of retaliation,” said Paul Krugman in The New York Times. Diplomacy has failed; only a realistic threat will budge China from its policy of sucking in capital from every corner of the developed world and sitting on it to hold down the value of its own currency. A responsible member of the global community would be reinvesting that mountain of capital to help “the world economy as a whole pull out of its slump.” Yet China does no such thing. The Obama administration has “been incredibly, infuriatingly passive in the face of China’s bad behavior.” At least Congress has proved willing to call that behavior what it is: a “predatory currency policy.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Today's political cartoons - November 2, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - anti-fascism, early voter turnout, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Geoff Capes obituary: shot-putter who became the World’s Strongest Man
In the Spotlight The 'mighty figure' was a two-time Commonwealth Champion and world-record holder
By The Week UK Published
-
Israel attacks Iran: a 'limited' retaliation
Talking Point Iran's humiliated leaders must decide how to respond to Netanyahu's measured strike
By The Week UK Published
-
Issue of the week: Yahoo’s ban on working from home
feature There’s a “painful irony” in Yahoo’s decision to make all its employees come to the office to work.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Another big airline merger
feature The merger of American Airlines and US Airways will be the fourth between major U.S. airlines in five years.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Feds’ fraud suit against S&P
feature The Justice Department charged S&P with defrauding investors by issuing mortgage security ratings it knew to be misleading.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Why investors are worried about Apple
feature Some investors worry that the company lacks the “passion and innovation that made it so extraordinary for so long.”
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Does Google play fair?
feature The Federal Trade Commission cleared Google of accusations that it skews search results to its favor.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: The Fed targets unemployment
feature By making public its desire to lower unemployment, the Fed hopes to inspire investors “to behave in ways that help bring that about.”
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Is Apple coming home?
feature Apple's CEO said the company would spend $100 million next year to produce a Mac model in the U.S.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Gunning for a hedge fund mogul
feature The feds are finally closing in on legendary hedge fund boss Steven Cohen.
By The Week Staff Last updated