Israel vs. Iran: Is an attack imminent?
According to an article in The Atlantic, there is a “better than 50 percent chance” that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will soon order an airstrike on Iranian nuclear-enrichment facilities.
“Will Israel bomb Iran?” asked Fred Kaplan in Slate.com. That provocative question was thrust to the top of the foreign-policy agenda after The Atlantic this month published a deeply reported article by journalist Jeffrey Goldberg that concludes there’s a “better than 50 percent chance” that Israel’s hawkish Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will soon order an airstrike on Iranian nuclear-enrichment facilities. Israelis are aware of the possible catastrophic consequences, including “a full-blown regional war,” Goldberg reports, but that’s a risk Israel appears willing to take to stave off the “existential threat” of an Iranian nuclear bomb. The Obama administration “is getting nervous,” said Jennifer Rubin in Commentary. Unnamed officials quoted in The New York Times last week insisted they had “persuaded Israel” that Iran was having trouble enriching uranium—perhaps because the U.S. had secretly sabotaged centrifuge parts the Iranians bought. As a result, the Obama administration contends, Iran is still at least a year away from producing a nuclear weapon. But that story sure sounds like White House “spin” aimed at pressuring Israel to step back.
Who’s spinning whom? asked Glenn Greenwald in Salon.com. The Atlantic piece was presented as “objective journalism,” but Goldberg’s true purpose was “to mainstream the debate over an Israeli or American attack on Iran”—to make it seem like a reasonable option, instead of a reckless act of aggression. It certainly seems as if Goldberg’s sources want to “pave the way for an attack,” said Marc Lynch in TheAtlantic.com. But the consequences would be catastrophic—a regional war, soaring oil and gas prices, the destruction of Iran’s struggling democracy movement, and even a more complicated U.S. drawdown in Iraq.
The consequences of not acting would be worse, said Michael Rubin in the New York Daily News. Once Iran’s nuclear bomb is finally built, it inevitably will be controlled by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the most radical and ruthless element in the regime. These “true believers” are not rational actors, and they could well use the threat of a strike on Tel Aviv to blackmail the West, or could even launch such a strike even though a devastating Israeli counter-strike would be inevitable. President Obama calls the prospect of Iranian nukes “unacceptable,” yet his administration has signaled openness to a policy of “containment.” You can’t contain fanatics hellbent on striking a historic blow against “Zionists” and infidels.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Don’t be so sure of that, said former Republican Rep. Bob Barr in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Despite their long intransigence, the Iranians now have incentive to seek a peaceful way out of confrontation. “The United Nations’ tightening embargo” is choking Iran’s economy, and the Iranian population—already unhappy with the government—is increasingly restless. Some Arab regimes have let on in recent weeks that a military strike against Iran is “something they can live with,” which, along with warnings from Israel, has to cause real alarm in Tehran. That’s why the smartest, and most responsible, next step is to seek face-to-face talks between Obama and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Even if Iran does not negotiate in good faith, said Art Keller in Foreign Policy, a policy of continued diplomatic pressure, sanctions, and containment can work. That same combination, let us not forget, prevented Saddam Hussein from rebuilding his stockpile of chemical and biological weapons. Containment would require years of patience, but given the likely consequences of war, it’s the wisest way “to thwart the Islamic Republic’s plans.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
The toilet roll tax: UK's strange VAT rules
The Explainer 'Mysterious' and 'absurd' tax brought in £168 billion to HMRC last year
By The Week UK Published
-
Why is Tesla stumbling?
In the Spotlight More competition, confusion about the future and a giant pay package for Elon Musk
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
How Taylor Swift changed copyright negotiations in music
under the radar The success of Taylor's Version rerecordings has put new pressure on record labels
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published