The great 'anchor baby' debate
Leading Republicans say the 14th Amendment's guarantee of citizenship shouldn't apply to kids of illegal immigrants. Political posturing, or common sense?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5c38/d5c388e01ea55853f02d448fe32c74a2fa050c9c" alt="A baby born to immigrant parents from Guatemala."
Republicans have staked out a new battleground in the fight against illegal immigration. Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) and Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-SC), among other leading party figures, are arguing that it's time to repeal the portion of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution that is widely interpreted as a guarantee of citizenship to anyone born in the U.S. The goal? To discourage aliens from sneaking into the country to have so-called anchor babies — new-born citizens giving their illegal parents a toehold in the U.S. Is it time to do away with "birthright citizenship"? (Watch Jon Kyl argue in favor of the repeal)
This is political posturing, and it marks a new low for the right: Birthright citizenship has been "the law of the land for the last 142 years, written into constitutional stone," for crying out loud, says Steve Benen in Washington Monthly. This isn't the first time conservatives have tried to win votes by attacking immigrants in a time of "economic anxiety," but it takes their demagoguery to a disgusting new level. Fortunately, they don't have the votes to repeal much of anything at this point.
"McConnell calls for 14th Amendment hearing"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
There's nothing radical about restoring the 14th Amendment's intent: If you actually listen to what the Republican politicians are saying, says Daniel Foster at the National Review, you'll realize they're not talking about doing anything outrageous. If the GOP bashers would calm down, they might recognize "there is a credible argument" that those words were never intended to grant citizenship to "individuals who are here illegally," and a simple new law could clear things up.
"HuffPo: Republicans to repeal 14th Amendment, peace at Appomattox"
Leave the kids out of it: Even a partial repeal of the 14th Amendment would be "a costly, pointless national embarrassment," say the editors of the Keene, NH, Sentinel. Birthright citizenship may be abused in "rare cases," but "to the rest of the world it is an expression of American generosity and confidence." So instead of changing the Constitution, why not just attack the real problem — illegal immigration — with better laws, and a concerted effort to actually enforce them.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How worried should we be about asteroids?
Today's Big Question Odds of asteroid 2024 YR4 hitting Earth have fluctuated wildly this week
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Why does Elon Musk take his son everywhere?
Talking Point With his four-year-old 'emotional support human' by his side, what message is the world's richest man sending?
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK Published
-
The Week Unwrapped: Why are sinkholes becoming more common?
Podcast Plus, will Saudi investment help create the "Netflix of sport"? And why has New Zealand's new tourism campaign met with a savage reception?
By The Week UK Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published