Should the Tea Party dump Glenn Beck?

The Tea Party has to choose between "clownish" Glenn Beck and the more sober Rick Santelli as the face of the movement, argues a new Weekly Standard article

Talk show host Glenn Beck.
(Image credit: Corbis)

In a long article for the latest issue of the Weekly Standard, Matthew Continetti argues that the Tea Party has two faces: CNBC ranter Rick Santelli ("forward-looking, optimistic, free-market populist") and Fox News emoter Glenn Beck (backward-facing, bleak, radical conspiracy monger). Tea Partiers can transform the country — and the Republican Party — if they put forward their Santelli face, he says, while embracing Beck will only lead to marginalization and defeat. Is ditching Beck's brand of conservative populism the Tea Party's ticket to mainstream success?

Banishing Beck is a good start: Continetti's correct that "Beck's brand of rhetoric is poisonous nonsense that does damage to the right," says Conor Friedersdorf in The Atlantic. But why does he stop with Beck? Fellow bestsellers Mark Levin and Andrew McCarthy, for instance, also "misleadingly" pit "a liberty loving right" against "an imagined cabal of leftists" that "seeks tyranny." You can't win a war of ideas against an imaginary opponent.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up