The practice of "telemedicine," or providing medical services over computer videoconferencing, is gaining traction nationwide. In Iowa, over the protests of abortion opponents, Planned Parenthood is using the long-distance technology to help terminate pregnancies: A videoconferenced doctor releases a dose of the "abortion pill" mifepristone (formerly RU-486) to a patient following an in-person exam with a nurse at a remote clinic. Are pro-life groups right to attack the practice as unsafe? (Watch a local report about Iowa's abortion "telemedicine")
Abortionists have hit a new, dangerous low: How can this "novel way to abort babies — by remote control" — be safe? asks Matthew Archbold in the National Catholic Register. When doctors remotely administer the abortion pill "with all the humanity of a Pez dispenser," who cares for the woman if something goes wrong? No one. This is a "dehumanizing," desperate, and ill-advised answer to the shrinking number of abortion doctors.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The grousing is about abortion, not safety: Planned Parenthood's devised an "innovative, high-tech solution to the lack of abortion access in rural Iowa," says Roxann MtJoy at Change.org, and it's bound to take off nationwide. The women receive ample care and counseling, and "telemedicine has been used for years" in other fields — funny that "only when this technology is expanded to women's reproductive health are people crying foul."
"How webcams expand abortion access in rural Iowa"
Pro-lifers are worried about both: Yes, we're against all abortion, says Operation Rescue head Troy Newman, to The New York Times. But we also believe "removing the doctor-patient relationship" from a emotionally fraught experience is "a prescription for disaster." When "one abortionist sitting in his pajamas at home could literally do thousands of abortions a week," not acting is not an option.
-
Exploring ancient forests on three continentsThe Week Recommends Reconnecting with historic nature across the world
-
How oil tankers have been weaponisedThe Explainer The seizure of a Russian tanker in the Atlantic last week has drawn attention to the country’s clandestine shipping network
-
The rise of the spymaster: a ‘tectonic shift’ in Ukraine’s politicsIn the Spotlight President Zelenskyy’s new chief of staff, former head of military intelligence Kyrylo Budanov, is widely viewed as a potential successor
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
