Blumenthal: Why did he lie about Vietnam?
Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal seemed set to win a U.S. Senate seat in November until he was caught embellishing his military record.
“To fib is human,” said John Schwartz in The New York Times. But for Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, it may also be a career killer. Blumenthal, who appeared destined to win a U.S. Senate seat in November, was forced to admit last week that he has occasionally embellished his military record, suggesting publicly that he had served “in” Vietnam when in fact he had served stateside in the Marine Reserve during the war. “On a few occasions, I have misspoken about my service,” Blumenthal said, “and for that I take full responsibility.” Blumenthal, 64, now begs our pardon, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. But as a publicity-hungry prosecutor in the mold of the now-disgraced Eliot Spitzer, “he has accused hundreds of people and businesses” of fraud for statements “less egregious than his own untruthful claims.” Clearly, Blumenthal lacks the “character” the public has a right to expect in a U.S. senator.
That’s far too harsh, said Margaret Carlson in Bloomberg.com. All of Blumenthal’s campaign and biographical material states his military service correctly, and until his recent exaggerations, he did so in speeches, too. His reputation, till now, has been that of a straight arrow with an incredible record of achievement: magna cum laude at Harvard, editor of the Yale Law Journal, a Supreme Court clerkship, White House aide, and then a successful political career. Unlike many politicians who were eligible (Dick Cheney and Bill Clinton come to mind), he actually served in the military during Vietnam. So why the recent deception? My guess is that he was acting “not from the pathology of the liar but from that of the perfectionist who wanted to erase the blemish only he could see.”
Blumenthal’s hardly the first politician to put a spin on his military record, said Jonathan Turley in NYTimes.com. President Ronald Reagan told Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir that his U.S. Army unit helped liberate the Nazi concentration camps, even though Reagan spent his service making war movies in Hollywood. For politicians, military service during some critical period in history validates their manhood and casts them in a new light—“not some self-serving egomaniac but a selfless public servant.” Lying about serving in Vietnam does cast Blumenthal in a new light, said Kathleen Parker in The Washington Post, and it’s not flattering. “Real heroes never brag, and real Marines don’t lie.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Experts are split on the findings in RFK Jr.'s 'MAHA' report
In the Spotlight The HHS secretary's report targeted processed foods and vaccines, among other things
-
Jony Ive changed the world with the iPhone. Can he do it again with OpenAI?
Talking Points Ive is joining OpenAI, hoping to create another transformative piece of personal technology. Can lightning strike twice?
-
Elon Musk says he's 'done enough' political spending. What does that really mean?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The world's richest man predicted he'd do 'a lot less' electoral financing moving forward. Has Washington seen the last of the tech titan?
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy