Wikipedia's war on porn
Does founder Jimmy Wales' crusade to purge Wikipedia of sexually explicit images go too far — or not far enough?

A fight has broken out over sexually explicit content on Wikipedia, the world's largest open-source reference site. Jimmy Wales, who cofounded the site with Larry Sanger, deleted hundreds of nude photos after his estranged partner Sanger told the FBI that Wikipedia's parent company was "knowingly distributing child pornography." Some users are protesting Wales' "undemocratic" decision to yank material from the user-generated site — and Wales has responded by giving up some of his editing privileges. Has Wales done too much cleaning up — or not enough?
It was a feeble effort: Wales didn't begin to solve the problem, says Jana Winter at FoxNews.com. The images to which the FBI was alerted are still online, "along with an entire category called 'nude children' and other photos of naked children."
"Despite content purge, pornographic images remain on Wikimedia"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Fox News is stirring up a phony controversy: The leading too-much-porn critics here — Fox News — are "complete dunderheads," says Nicholas Deleon in CrunchGear. The internet is overloaded with "explicit" porn sites. But about the raciest image you'll find on Wikipedia is a nude photo in the entry about human anatomy. Leave Jimmy alone!
"Wikipedia finds out first-hand that, in America, the naked human body is a terribly sinful thing"
The battle is just beginning: This is war, says Ireland's TechCentral. Sanger insists there's child pornography on the sites, but Wikipedia's parent company says no illegal content is permitted. There's a "fine line" between "what is protected by free speech and what is just obscene for obscenity’s sake" — let's hope that defensibly educational materials won't be deleted.
"Jimmy Wales wades into Wikipedia porn debate"
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The best shows to see at Edinburgh Fringe 2025
The Week Recommends The world's biggest arts festival is back with an incredible line-up
-
Wonsan-Kalma: North Korea's new 'mammoth' beach resort
Under the Radar Pyongyang wants to boost tourism but there won't be many foreign visitors to Kim Jong Un's 'pet project'
-
The 5 best TV reboots of all time
The Week Recommends Finding an entirely new cast to play beloved characters is harder than it looks