Illegal immigration: The next battle
Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina have crafted a pragmatic proposal to tackle immigration reform.
At last, “an elegant proposal for immigration reform” that a majority of Americans can support, said Froma Harrop in The Providence Journal-Bulletin. Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina have crafted a pragmatic, bipartisan compromise that would provide a legal path for temporary workers from Mexico and other nations to enter the country to do necessary jobs. Those already here would get a route to citizenship—but only if they pay a fine and back taxes and learn English. In return, the new law would beef up border enforcement and crack down on employers who hire undocumented workers. Everyone in the U.S. would be issued a Social Security card with a biometric marker, such as an iris scan or a fingerprint, making it clear who is eligible to work in the U.S. and who isn’t. Sadly, “it will take a miracle” to get this bill passed, said the Los Angeles Times in an editorial. In the wake of the ugly fight over health-care reform, Republicans and Democrats are more bitterly divided than ever.
Dealing with illegal immigration will always be hard and divisive—“so why not now?” said The Arizona Republic. The Schumer/Graham proposal has all the elements for “meaningful reform,” with measures that should assure both those who want undocumented workers treated fairly and those who oppose a simple “amnesty.” Right now, we have the momentum, said Gabriel Thompson in The Nation. Just weeks ago, 200,000 people descended on Washington to call for immigration reform, and more demonstrations are planned throughout the nation. Latino voters have “growing clout,” and it’s time to let millions of people who want to work “come out of the shadows.”
There’s a much simpler solution, said George Will in The Washington Post. End “birthright citizenship”—the policy that automatically makes citizens of any children born to illegal immigrants on U.S. soil. That policy has served as a magnet for people to cross the border, and accounts for nearly 10 percent of all U.S. births in recent years. By tweaking the wording of the Civil Rights Act of 1866—a time when, it should be noted, there were no illegal immigrants—Congress can take away this incentive to cross the border. That reform, in itself, would “drain some of the scalding steam” from the fight that’s now brewing.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Striking homes with indoor poolsFeature Featuring a Queen Anne mansion near Chicago and mid-century modern masterpiece in Washington
-
Why are federal and local authorities feuding over investigating ICE?TODAY’S BIG QUESTION Minneapolis has become ground zero for a growing battle over jurisdictional authority
-
‘Even those in the United States legally are targets’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred