Karzai’s win clouds Obama’s Afghan strategy
The White House must now decide whether Karzai can be a reliable ally, and if not, what that means for the 8-year-old U.S. war effort in Afghanistan.
What happened
Afghanistan’s troubled presidential election came to a jarring end this week when President Hamid Karzai’s sole opponent dropped out of the race, claiming that a fair vote was impossible. Election officials quickly declared Karzai the winner and canceled the runoff, which had been scheduled for late this week. President Obama, who had pushed hard for the new vote, congratulated Karzai, but warned him that he had “to write a new chapter” in Afghanistan by tackling corruption and building a more inclusive governing coalition. “The proof is not going to be in words, it’s going to be in deeds,” Obama said. Karzai had prevailed in October balloting, but agreed to a runoff against second-place finisher Abdullah Abdullah after international monitors threw out millions of fraudulent votes, driving Karzai’s total below the 50 percent needed for an outright win.
The political turmoil in Afghanistan comes as Obama nears a decision on whether to send tens of thousands of additional troops and on how best to deploy U.S. resources there. Administration officials acknowledge that any effective strategy will require a functional government in Kabul that can deliver services, maintain security, and oppose a Taliban-led insurgency that controls much of the Afghan countryside. The White House must now decide whether Karzai can be a reliable ally, and if not, what that means for the 8-year-old U.S. war effort in Afghanistan.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What the editorials said
The White House is trying mightily to put a positive spin on this “mess,” said the Los Angeles Times. But there’s no denying that Karzai is looking “increasingly illegitimate,” thus crippling American attempts to forge a unified nation out of chaos. Karzai “is going to have to do everything in his power to persuade his people—and the rest of the world—that he is deserving of their trust,” said The New York Times. He and his reluctant American backers “don’t have much time to get this right.”
The election raises bigger questions about Obama than about Karzai, said The Wall Street Journal. “By broadcasting so publicly its distaste” for Karzai, the administration has poisoned its relationship with the man it needs to carry out its plans for Afghanistan—whatever they turn out to be. The White House’s on-again, off-again, on-again courtship of Afghanistan’s elected leader only reinforces doubts about whether “America’s president is committed to his own strategy.”
What the columnists said
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
It’s true that Karzai begins his second term “with a marked credibility gap,” said Amir Taheri in the New York Post. But Abdullah’s withdrawal does create “a breathing space in which to sort out several crucial issues.” The most important is the form Afghanistan’s government should take. For centuries, Afghanistan’s various ethnic and tribal groups shared power under the guidance of a “loya jirga,” or council of elders. The U.S. and NATO can now lean on Karzai to restore this time-honored system, starting with an invitation to Abdullah to join his government. “For Afghanistan to have peace, it must belong to everyone.”
But after the farcical conclusion to the “election,” said Christopher Hitchens in Slate.com, “there can’t be any Afghan who believes that the process is anything much more than a cynical fix.” And by stamping its approval on Karzai’s stolen victory, the Obama administration, as well as the United Nations, has essentially handed a victory to the Taliban thugs. Not only does the election harden Afghans’ contempt for their own government, said Peter Galbraith in the London Guardian, it undercuts the rationale for committing more troops. With Karzai in control, sending additional U.S. or NATO troops “is a waste of precious military resources.”
The U.S. is left with “a classic American dilemma,” said David Ignatius in The Washington Post. “How does a superpower fix problems in a faraway country without dictating policies in a way that ultimately enfeebles the very people we are trying to help?” Obama seems to be trying to walk this “tightrope,” by both backing Karzai and pushing him to change his ways. But in the end, Karzai must understand that for him, “the political calculus is brutally simple: It’s reform or die.”
-
What should you be stockpiling for 'World War Three'?
In the Spotlight Britons advised to prepare after the EU tells its citizens to have an emergency kit just in case
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Carnivore diet: why people are eating only meat
The Explainer 'Meatfluencers' are taking social media by storm but experts warn meat-only diets have health consequences
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published