United Kingdom: Run by unelected ‘quangocrats’
In Britain a movement is afoot to purge the country of quangos, the “quasi-autonomous non-government organizations” that handle much of the nation's day-to-day governing.
No wonder the British Parliament can’t get anything done, said Edward Heathcoat Amory in the London Daily Mail. It has hardly any power anymore. Most of the day-to-day governing of this country has been outsourced to the unelected bodies known as “quasi-autonomous non-government organizations,” or quangos. Since the 1980s, we’ve created more than 1,000 of them, spending billions of pounds of taxpayer money, according to a report released last week. These bodies decide everything from how much our farmers should be paid (the Agricultural Wages Board) to which low-income students should go to university (the Office for Fair Access) and the medicines available at the National Health Service (the National Institute for Clinical Excellence). “Some are a pointless bureaucratic intrusion, others actively damaging, and many simply overlap with each other.” Conservative opposition leader David Cameron this week proposed a purge of the quangos. “It’s long, long overdue.”
But it won’t be easy, said Simon Carr in the London Independent. Politicians love to demonize quangos, but they also depend on them. Quangos are “very handy for passing the buck.” Whenever tough decisions have to be made, the government sets up new bodies and “pays them big public money to take the heat.” Even Cameron, in his press conference this week calling for a “bonfire of the quangos,” fell back on the old quango dodge. When a reporter asked him if it would be easier to save money by just freezing the pay of government employees, Cameron was unwilling to alienate those millions of voters. So he punted, saying, “Pay review bodies are there to look at this.” Those bodies, of course, are quangos, set up “to shield politicians” from the responsibility of cutting wages.
That is why they are so pervasive, said Elizabeth Truss in the London Guardian. It’s much easier to create a new quango and be seen as “doing something” than it is to kill an old one, destroying the jobs that go with it. “Like abandoned space stations, left to drift while the new model is developed, previous governments’ quangos have created unappealing debris across the public sector.” As they proliferate, they rob us of our democracy. Our elected leaders can’t change anything “if all of their key decision-making powers are in the hands of bodies they can’t touch.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
We all agree, then, said Anne Treneman in the London Times. All of Britain is solidly behind Cameron’s proposal. Kill the quangos! So which ones will die first? Cameron refused to say. He wants to “devise a quango virility test to see if what each does has actual merit.” It sounds like a good idea, except that it will surely require a new quango to create and apply the test. We may be doomed to live forever in “a dystopia full of quasi-organizations that breed without control, their bosses on bloated pay, their costs climbing skyward.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
What dangers does the leaked Signal chat expose the US to?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The White House's ballooning group chat scandal offered a masterclass in what not to say when prying eyes might be watching
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
6 breathtaking homes in capital cities
Feature Featuring a glass conservatory in Atlanta and a loft library in Boston
By The Week US Published
-
Spring's best new cookbooks, from pizza to pastries
The Week Recommends Pizza, an array of brownies and Cantonese-American mash-ups are on the menu
By Scott Hocker, The Week US Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published