‘Torture memos’: What do they really reveal?
Did harsh interrrogation of al Qaida operatives glean valuable information? While Bush administration and CIA officials say plots were disrupted, other inteliigence officials dispute those claims.
President Obama has “acted courageously and wisely,” said The Washington Post in an editorial. By releasing—and repudiating—four Bush-era Justice Department memos that gave the CIA legal license to sadistically interrogate suspected terrorists, he has restored some of this nation’s lost “moral authority.” To read these “nauseating” documents is “to take a journey into depravity,” said The New York Times. In “the precise bureaucratese favored by dungeon masters throughout history,” Bush’s Office of Legal Counsel ruled that CIA interrogators could slam prisoners against walls, confine them in cramped, dark boxes, keep them standing with their arms handcuffed over their heads for endless hours of agony, and deprive them of sleep for up to 11 days. Waterboarding, the terrifying, simulated drowning technique favored by the Nazis, North Koreans, and medieval torturers, also was permissible, since no one actually was drowned.
If you actually read these memos in historical context, said Rich Lowry in National Review Online, they should be “a source of pride.” Carefully reasoned, the memos “represent a nation of laws struggling to defend itself against a savage, lawless enemy while adhering to its legal commitments and norms.” In all cases, Bush’s legal team mandated that the techniques not inflict “severe physical or mental pain or suffering.” When detainees were “walled,” for example, the documents required that they be thrown against fake, flexible walls, with their necks buttressed by towels to prevent whiplash. “Not exactly Torquemada.” More important, the interrogation methods worked—and saved American lives, said former Bush speechwriter Marc A. Thiessen in The Washington Post. The CIA has repeatedly reported that it obtained critical information through the harsh interrogation of top al Qaida operatives Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and Abu Zubaydah. Mohammed revealed details of a “Second Wave” of attacks that included a plot to fly a plane into a Los Angeles skyscraper, while Zubaydah provided a very useful list of al Qaida operatives and plots.
How do we know this is true? asked Dan Froomkin in Washingtonpost.com. Bush administration and CIA officials “in full CYA mode” are not reliable sources about what torture actually yielded, and their assertions about disrupted plots have been repeatedly disputed by other intelligence officials. Just this week, several intelligence officials told The New York Times that Zubaydah actually gave up everything he knew before the torture began. If waterboarding and torture were so effective, said Andrew Sullivan in TheAtlantic.com, why was Zubaydah ultimately waterboarded 83 times, and Mohammed 183 times? Well, now we know. Intelligence officials revealed this week that Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld were desperate for Zubaydah and Mohammed to provide “proof of the links between al Qaida and Iraq” that would have justified the Iraq war. Alas, the al Qaida operatives could not help them, even when reduced to babbling, broken men pleading for their lives.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
To settle this debate, said Timothy Rutten in the Los Angeles Times, we need a bipartisan “truth commission” that can finally determine what information torture produced, and at what cost. Someday, terrorists will again attack this country. “If it occurs in the absence of a clear historical record of what the Bush/Cheney torture policies did or did not accomplish,” torture’s defenders will charge that “Americans died because their soft-headed countrymen were preoccupied with civil liberties and human rights.” So let’s get answers.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Biden warns of oligarchy in farewell address
Speed Read The president issued a stark warning about the dangers of unchecked power in the hands of the ultra-wealthy
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - January 16, 2025
Cartoons Thursday's cartoons - a tentative ceasefire, warring factions, and more
By The Week US Published
-
A Real Pain: Kieran Culkin and Jesse Eisenberg star in 'uproariously funny' drama
The Week Recommends The film, dubbed an heir of Woody Allen, follows Jewish American cousins who travel to Poland in memory of their late grandmother
By The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published