Can Obama get back AIG’s bonuses?
Some ideas on how he might, or on why he shouldn’t try
What happened
Facing a growing political storm, President Obama said Monday that he'd asked the Treasury to “pursue every single legal avenue” to block $165 million in bonuses to AIG’s Financial Products unit. (Watch the video) Administration officials said the bonuses were distributed last Friday, but that the Treasury would try to recoup the money as a condition for AIG’s drawing down its next $30 billion in bailout funds. (The Wall Street Journal)
What the commentators said
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
AIG’s rationale for paying these economy-wreckers, said Roger Simon in Politico, apparently accepted by Obama’s economic team, is that it was contractually obligated to do so. “Baloney.” Contracts get breached all the time. If these executives want their bonuses, let them sue to get them.
Having taxpayers foot the bill for those bonuses stings, said Andrew Ross Sorkin in The New York Times. But it’s best to “swallow hard and pay up.” First, the “sanctity of contracts” really is essential for all business transactions. And second, these derivatives “brainiacs”—on the verge of fleeing AIG, and yes, someone will hire them—might be the only ones who can “defuse” the financial “bomb” they built.
“Maybe there’s a simpler path,” said Matt Miller in The Daily Beast. Obama could just ask the executives to give back the money, appealing to their patriotism and sense of public service. If they say no, he could add an “incentive”—he’ll publish their names and bonus amounts, and let the public be the judge.
The American public owns 80 percent of AIG, said the Chicago Tribune in an editorial. So, America, “how do you want your company run?” Before you give incentives for “talented staff” to leave, remember, as top shareholders, you will benefit only if AIG “survives and thrives.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
5 exclusive cartoons about Trump and Putin negotiating peace
Cartoons Artists take on alternative timelines, missing participants, and more
By The Week US Published
-
The AI arms race
Talking Point The fixation on AI-powered economic growth risks drowning out concerns around the technology which have yet to be resolved
By The Week UK Published
-
Why Jannik Sinner's ban has divided the tennis world
In the Spotlight The timing of the suspension handed down to the world's best male tennis player has been met with scepticism
By The Week UK Published