Renaming ‘enemy combatants’
Is Obama dropping a controversial Bush policy on Guantanamo terror suspects, or just changing a term?
Chalk up another win for the terrorists, said the New York Daily News in an editorial. President Obama, who has already ordered the detainment camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to be closed, on Friday stopped calling the prisoners there enemy combatants, “possibly paving the way to recasting how the U.S. deals with them.” This is just another example of how the Obama and Bush administrations, aided by the courts, have made “prosecuting the blatantly guilty virtually impossible.”
“Right-wing polemicists,” said Glenn Greenwald in Salon, love to accuse Obama of “radically reversing Bush/Cheney Terrorism policies” (read former vice president Dick Cheney’s comments to CNN). But in the case of one of Bush’s most “extremist” detention theories—the power to detain “enemy combatants”—Obama is ditching the term while asserting the right to hold terrorism suspects without criminal charges. So Obama’s change is really just “cosmetic.”
Not entirely, said Frank James in the Chicago Tribune. The Bush administration insisted that the Constitution gave the president the right to hold enemy combatants in time of war, but Obama says it’s international law that gives him the right to hold the Guantanamo crowd. This is a rare “instance of a president voluntarily relinquishing some power claimed by a predecessor.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Music reviews: Bon Iver, Valerie June, and The Waterboys
Feature "Sable, Fable," "Owls, Omens, and Oracles," "Life, Death, and Dennis Hopper"
By The Week US
-
Are bonds worth investing in?
the explainer They can diversify your portfolio and tend to be a safer investment than stocks
By Becca Stanek, The Week US
-
Elon has his 'Legion.' How will Republicans encourage other Americans to have babies?
Today's Big Question The pronatalist movement finds itself in power
By Joel Mathis, The Week US
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK