CEO pay: The new, $500,000 limit
President Obama announced last week that top executives at banks receiving federal bailout funds will have their salaries capped at $500,000.
“Is this any way to treat our best and brightest?” said Harold Meyerson in The Washington Post. “Damn straight it is.” Since President Obama announced last week that top executives at banks receiving federal bailout funds will have their salaries capped at $500,000, Wall Street’s fat cats have been crying, “Socialism!” Can they be serious? In recent years, the average CEO salary has skyrocketed from 24 times the pay of the average worker to 275 times. There’s no principle more fundamental to this nation than the exchange of a fair wage for an honest day’s work, and if “the guys who ran our banking system into the ground” are going to accept hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer welfare, they should expect a little populist payback.
“There’s no sense trying to defend” the astronomical salaries of Wall Street executives, said Thomas McClanahan in The Kansas City Star, but “the larger issues raised here are troubling.” Once we agree to let a politician sitting in Washington, D.C., determine the salary of a banker in New York, it’s only a matter of time before the politician starts pressuring the banker “into making questionable loans to politically preferred recipients,” and before you know it you have a nationalized banking system, and a corrupt one at that. There’s a more immediate problem, said Charlie Gasparino in TheDailybeast.com. Like it or not, talented financial executives can still command far more than $500,000 a year. In the end, Obama’s salary cap will serve only to drive the best executives away from struggling banks.
You mean the same talented “executives who got us into this mess?” said the San Francisco Chronicle in an editorial. Heaven forbid we lose their visionary leadership. No, the only real problem with Obama’s proposed salary-cap rules is that “the restrictions don’t go far enough.” Firms that have already received bailout funds are exempt, and there are no restrictions on executives being paid in shares. But even if the salary cap does end up having more of a symbolic impact than a practical one, that doesn’t make it a failure, for we could use a little symbolism. “While families are losing their homes, workers are losing their jobs, and taxpayers are footing the bill for the enormous errors made on Wall Street,” it would be nice to see bank executives accustomed to $20 million incomes share in the suffering. That is, if you think making $500,000 is suffering.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Trump's actions cut a wide swath across Hawaii's economy
In Depth The state's tourism and farming sectors are two of the largest hit industries
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
5 immersive books to read this April for a brief escape
The Week Recommends A dystopian tale takes us to the library, a journalist's ode to her refugee parents and more
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
'The winners and losers of AI may not be where we expect'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published