Republicans vs. the auto union
Why the Detroit bailout appears DOA
“Craven” Senate Republicans killed a bipartisan deal to save GM and Chrysler, said John Judis in The New Republic online, because the United Auto Workers, “desperate for the deal,” agreed only to phased-in, not immediate, cuts in wages and benefits, to the level non-union Japanese auto plants pay in key GOP senators’ home states. It’s “despicable” to let Japanese automakers, who pay union wages in Japan, dictate what U.S. firms pay American workers.
“I’m with the Republicans” on this one, said Maura Kelly in Britain’s The Guardian. The Japanese carmakers are just better. Yes, the U.S. will bleed jobs and money if its auto industry collapses, but it’s “silly” to “temporarily bolster” automakers that have been making bad business and environmental decisions, and even worse cars, for so long.
Republicans aren’t blaming the auto executives, though, said Todd Spangler and Justin Hyde in the Detroit Free Press. They’re blaming the UAW, which over the last decade has spent "more than $10 million to elect Democrats and defeat Republicans”—including several GOP senators now “being asked to save the domestic auto industry from ruination before giving up their seats.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Yes, but the automakers themselves have long supported the GOP over Democrats, “sometimes by more than a 3-to-1 ratio,” said Ken Bensinger in the Los Angeles Times. Now they’ve “discovered just how little loyalty that investment strategy had bought them.”
From “a cynical, purely political” standpoint, the GOP should have supported this bailout, said Dan Riehl in Riehl World View. Because it didn’t, the party is “now known as the only reason the American auto industry went down the tubes”—and “all for a measly $15 billion.” It would have been better to hold fire until January, when GM asks for lots more money and Democrats overreach.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Breaking news: the rise of ‘smash hit’ rage roomsUnder the Radar Paying to vent your anger on furniture is all the rage but experts are sceptical
-
Did markets’ ‘Sell America’ trade force Trump to TACO on Greenland?Today’s Big Question Investors navigate a suddenly uncertain global economy
-
‘We know how to make our educational system world-class again’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred