Hillary vs. Obama: Is she the stronger candidate?
“It is one of the last cards Hillary Clinton has to play,” said James Romoser in the Winston-Salem, N.C., Journal. With only 10 Democratic presidential caucuses and primaries left, and Barack Obama holding a nearly insurmountable lead in pledged delegates, the Clinton camp is making a daring argument: Obama, they say, is unelectable. Hillary’s argument, said Mark Halperin in Time, is that Obama’s base of wildly enthusiastic support “is largely a mirage.” Her case, directed at the 800 “superdelegates” (party officials and officeholders) who will put either her or Obama over the top, goes like this: To beat Republican John McCain, a Democrat will need to win over blue-collar whites, independent women, and Hispanics—all of whom have been wary of Obama, while strongly supporting her. Ignore the naïve, wishful thinking of the Obama supporters, she’s telling superdelegates, and make “a subjective decision” about which candidate is best positioned to take back the White House. “It’s a breathtaking gambit. And it could work.”
If you look at the election in terms of the Electoral College, said Sean Wilentz in Salon.com, Hillary’s argument makes sense. The general election will hinge on the winner-take-all system of electoral votes. If the Democratic primaries were conducted the same way, Clinton’s victories in the bigger states—including California, New York, and Ohio—would give her 1,743 pledged delegates, and Obama, 1,257. Under fairer, more sensible primary rules, Hillary would be winning, so the superdelegates should support her.
Yes, and if my grandmother had wheels, she’d be a bus, said Jonathan Chait in The New Republic Online. What a “bizarre” argument. First of all, imposing a winner-take-all system on the Democratic primaries would make them less democratic, not more. The current system—allocating delegates based on the proportion of the vote each candidate receives in each state—provides the purest measure of support, and though the Clintonistas hate to admit it, Obama is winning the popular vote. Maybe that’s why “Clinton supporters are spending an inordinate amount of time devising scenarios where Clinton would be winning if the rules of the primary were changed retroactively.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Hillary’s belief that only she can win key states is also nonsense, said Jeffrey Anderson in The Weekly Standard. She’s mostly won states that “no Democrat can realistically lose in November,” such as Massachusetts and New York, or states the Democrats have no hope of winning, such as Texas. Of the 17 swing states “that will likely determine the Democrats’ fate” this fall, Obama has so far won nine in the primaries and Hillary only five. The claim that Hillary is electable, and Obama isn’t, is a “fallacy.”
Wait, though, until the general election campaign, said William Kristol in The New York Times. If Obama gets the nomination, Republicans will challenge his claim of being a bipartisan uniter. The airwaves will be flooded with ads highlighting his “left-wing voting record in Illinois and Washington,” spiced up with videos reminding voters of his long association with the Rev. Jeremiah (“God damn America”) Wright.
Yes, Obama has some vulnerabilities, said Roger Simon in The Politico.com. But he already has a very effective counterargument to Clinton’s contention that she’ll be a stronger general election candidate. In the primaries, Clinton has run a terrible campaign, with no clear message, open dissension among her top staff, and several forced resignations. Obama, by contrast, has run a focused, smart, well-organized campaign. “You can tell a lot about a candidate by the campaign they run,” says Obama’s chief strategist, David Axelrod. In coming weeks, it’s an argument the superdelegates will be hearing a lot of, as they ponder their final choice.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Who are Syria's resurgent rebels?
The Explainer Surprise Aleppo offensive, led by controversial faction, has blindsided Bashar al-Assad and his allies
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Magical festive light trails around the UK
The Week Recommends These twinkling displays have pulled out all the stops to get you in the mood for Christmas
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
Donald Trump has said 'the most beautiful word in the dictionary is tariff'
Today's Big Question Donald Trump's threat to impose crippling tariffs 'part of a broader turn towards protectionism in the West'
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published