How they see us: Does the U.S. help Africa for oil

Africans warmly welcomed President Bush during his recent visit to their continent. But if they

Africans warmly welcomed President Bush during his recent visit to their continent. But if they’d known his true goal, said Elem Eyrice and Caglar Dolek in Turkey’s Journal of Turkish Weekly, they wouldn’t have cheered quite so enthusiastically. Bush stressed U.S. support of efforts to fight AIDS and other humanitarian campaigns, but that was just a cover for the real U.S. aim: “to establish permanent military bases in sub-Saharan Africa.” The U.S. already has strategic command centers for other parts of the world—CENTCOM for the Middle East, PACOM for the Pacific Ocean area—and now it wants AFRICOM for Africa. Why now? Because Africa is one of the last relatively untapped sources of oil, and the U.S. is afraid that China will get to it first. “Africa has been increasingly becoming a new battlefield for the two hegemonic powers.” Construction of a new U.S. base with a central command would put America ahead in that battle.

Tanzania wisely refused to host such a base, said Tanzania’s African in an editorial. “We believe that AFRICOM is nothing short of a sovereignty and resource grab,” a continuation of the same policy “that has brought destruction and terror” to the Middle East and Afghanistan. Boosting the U.S. military presence here would “be extremely damaging to Africa’s own security.”

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up
Explore More