Why the government should tell the truth.
The week's news at a glance.
China
Chinese officials did a fantastic job handling the recent water pollution crisis, said Sun Yingwei in a commentary for the state news agency Xinhua. It could have been catastrophic. An explosion at a chemical plant last month spilled 100 tons of benzene into the Songhua River, the main water source for Harbin City and other cities in Heilongjiang Province. Fortunately, officials acted “promptly.” They told the public in advance that water was to be cut off, so people could fill up receptacles. And they created a new water monitoring system, so future problems will be averted. As a result, “the work of handling the incident is being carried out in an orderly manner, the livelihoods of the masses are protected, the society is in order and stable, and the market is in perfect order.”
That’s not quite the whole story, said Zheng Manling in Hong Kong’s Ta Kung Pao. We thought Chinese officials had learned from the SARS debacle that “hiding unpleasant facts” creates more problems than it solves. Apparently, though, they have room for “further improvement.” In the first few days after the Nov. 13 explosion, Harbin City officials held “fierce internal debates,” first over whether to turn off the water and then over whether to tell citizens that their drinking water was filled with a hazardous, cancer-causing chemical. “In the end, those officials who advocated maintaining secrecy had the upper hand.” The city government announced that the taps would be shut off because sections of the water pipes were being rebuilt. But the people didn’t believe that story. Rumors swept through the city, people began to panic, and some started to pack up their families and flee. The chagrined Harbin government was finally forced, more than a week after the explosion, to admit the truth.
Harbin officials aren’t the only ones with some explaining to do, said Lu Zhijian in Guangzhou’s Yangcheng Wangbao. The benzene contamination originated at Jilin Petrochemical’s plant in Jilin City. Once Jilin’s officials realized that the toxic spill was downriver from them and wouldn’t harm their city, they “acted dishonorably,” failing to take any action to contain the spill. They simply “dumped the problem on others.” Only now, after widespread criticism, have the officials bothered to apologize. Such belated and grudging regrets “won’t win public approval.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Chinese press is awash in such sentiments, said Lillian Yang in Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post. Mainland newspapers that usually accept the official Xinhua versions of stories abandoned that meekness and sent their own reporters to Harbin and Jilin. The result was a flurry of articles critical of the provincial government. The Shanghai Morning Post accused Jilin Petrochemical of being shifty and evasive about the blast at its plant. The China Youth Daily slammed Harbin officials for lying. If they were trying to save face, it said, they failed and instead “brought shame on themselves.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Sundance Film Festival looks for a new home as movie buffs dial in
In the Spotlight The festival will be moving to Salt Lake City, Boulder, Colorado, or Cincinnati
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The Week contest: Trillionaire tome
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
'On arrival, workers faced a system of racial segregation'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published