Clinton
Getting defensive about bin Laden.
Bill Clinton doesn't usually lose his cool in public, said Dick Polman in The Philadelphia Inquirer. But this week, the former president's 'œserene and happy' demeanor cracked, and he 'œwigged out' during a confrontational interview with Chris Wallace on Fox News. Wallace asked Clinton why he didn't do more to kill Osama bin Laden. 'œI got closer to killing him than anybody's gotten since,' a visibly agitated Clinton said. He went on to blame his successors for failing to kill the terrorist leader before Sept. 11: 'œThey had eight months to try, they did not try.' His choler rising, Clinton leaned forward and pointed his finger at Wallace's chest. 'œYou did your nice little conservative hit job on me,' Clinton declared. 'œAnd you've got that little smirk on your face and you think you're so clever.'
Good for Clinton, said John Nichols in TheNation.com. The Bush administration and their right-wing media lapdogs have long peddled the lie that Sept. 11 was somehow all Clinton's fault, even though it happened on Bush's watch. But the record is clear: Clinton did make a serious effort to get bin Laden. Bush and Dick Cheney, on the other hand, spent the early part of 2001 secretly planning a war against Saddam Hussein and Iraq, even to the point of ignoring a specific warning that bin Laden was poised to attack. Hold on there, said Byron York in National Review Online. Yes, Clinton authorized some halfhearted attempts by our intelligence agencies to try to kill bin Laden. When they responded with inepitude and excuses, 'œClinton, the commander in chief, gave up.' That's his feckless legacy in the war on terror, no matter how many hissy fits he throws.
Dick Morris
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Eileen McGann
New York Post
Andrew Klavan
Los Angeles Times
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Quiz of The Week: 15 – 21 NovemberQuiz Have you been paying attention to The Week’s news?
-
Can the UK do more on climate change?Today's Big Question Labour has shown leadership in the face of fraying international consensus, but must show the public their green mission is ‘a net benefit, not a net cost’
-
The Week Unwrapped: Will US Catholics rebel against the Pope?Podcast Plus what are the ethics of freezing your late partner?
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration