Bush
When the ‘leak’ comes from the top.
President Bush clearly doesn't like leakers, said John Dickerson in Slate.com. In fact, he views them as 'œlow-level, frustrated bureaucrats who feed their own egos by passing along juicy tidbits to mangy reporters.' It turns out those bureaucrats are in good company. Court documents filed last week indicate that former vice presidential chief of staff I. Lewis 'œScooter' Libby told a grand jury that Bush indirectly authorized him to spill key intelligence about Iraq in 2003. Libby said that his boss, Dick Cheney, told him to release a portion of the National Intelligence Estimate that suggested that Saddam Hussein was trying to buy uranium ore from Niger for nuclear weapons. Libby, who faces charges of perjury and obstruction of justice in the Valerie Plame CIA leak investigation, shared the information with New York Times reporter Judith Miller. His leak was 'œpart of a larger administration effort,' Libby testified, to rebut critics who claimed that the White House had 'œdistorted evidence about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction during the march to war.'
The worst part, said Maureen Dowd in The New York Times, is that the information put out to the public was itself distorted. A week before Libby told Miller about Saddam's supposed nuclear ambitions, Secretary of State Colin Powell told three other reporters that U.S. intelligence agencies were 'œno longer carrying it as a credible item.' In other words, the White House was 'œwilling to use a faulty bit of intelligence to defend the war scam.' The leak was a lie, and it originated in the Oval Office.
Stop calling this a leak, said John Podhoretz in the New York Post. 'œA 'leak' is the unauthorized release of government information,' and it's illegal. But Libby said that he told Miller about Saddam's uranium plans 'œbecause he was authorized to do so by the president himself.' Constitutionally, the president 'œcan declassify a document merely by declaring it unclassified.' In fact, 'œby the time this 'leak' occurred, the contents' of the intelligence estimates relating to Iraq 'œwere almost entirely public.' In short, this story is just a 'œbogus kerfuffle,' said Andrew McCarthy in National Review Online, 'œmanufactured by the press—which should be ashamed of itself, since this kind of 'leaking' is the media's stock in trade.'
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Andrew Sullivan
Time.com
The Washington Post
New York Times
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Spaniards seeing red over bullfighting
Under the Radar Shock resignation of top matador is latest blow in culture war over tradition that increasingly divides Spain
-
Bailouts: Why Trump is rescuing Argentina
Feature The White House approved a $20 billion currency swap with Argentina
-
James indictment: Trump’s retribution
Feature Trump pursues charges against Letitia James in revenge for her civil fraud lawsuit
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ rallies
Speed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardon
Talking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidents
The Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'