Immigration
Closing the ‘birthright’ door.
What does it mean to be born in the USA? asked The Washington Post in an editorial. Not much, if a group of Republican House members get their way. The latest mean-spirited plan to tackle illegal immigration comes from Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo, who wants to end the practice of granting automatic citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil. Tancredo contends that 'œbirthright citizenship' only encourages illegal immigrants to sneak into America, and rewards them if they manage to stay here long enough to have a baby. Tancredo and his fellow 'œanti-immigrant demagogues' face the 'œsmall problem' that birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the Constitution. But while Tancredo scrambles to find a loophole, other members of Congress 'œought not follow him on this ugly and fruitless path.'
What's so ugly about protecting U.S. citizenship? said The Washington Times in an editorial. Illegal immigrants are abusing the 14th Amendment, which was passed to guarantee citizenship for slaves and their descendants after the Civil War. More than a century later, it's being used to reward the hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals who sneak into the U.S. every year. The statistics tell the story, said the Chattanooga, Tenn., Times Free Press. One in 10 babies born in the U.S. is the child of illegal aliens. These children are known as 'œanchor babies' because they give the entire family a foothold in the States. Not only does the child himself earn automatic U.S. citizenship, but eventually his relatives become eligible for benefits, which puts a 'œtremendous' burden on American taxpayers. Congress should not 'œallow this racket to continue.'
Tamar Jacoby
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Wall Street Journal
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
June 12 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Thursday's cartoons - due process, L.A. traffic, and more
-
Homework: Geoff Dyer brings 'a whole world' to life in his memoir
The Week Recommends Author writes about his experiences with 'humour and tenderness'
-
What happens if Israel attacks Iran?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Israel is 'ready to strike' and Tehran has plans for counterattacks against the US as nuclear talks appear deadlocked
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy