Rove
Can he weather the leak investigation?
President Bush seems to be taking 'œloophole' lessons from Bill Clinton, said Ellis Henican in Newsday. Twice, Bush has 'œmade an unqualified pledge' to fire any administration official who leaked the identity of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame. White House 'œsources' blew Plame's cover in press leaks back in 2003, in an act of political revenge. At the time, her husband, former U.S. diplomat Joe Wilson, was saying unkind things about the president. Now it's emerged that Bush's closest political advisor, Karl Rove, was among the leakers. So this week, Bush did some 'œpresidential wiggling' worthy of Clinton's oral-sex-isn't-sex hedge. Under pressure from the White House press corps, he reiterated that he would dismiss any leaker—but added the key phrase, 'œwho committed a crime.' That means Rove isn't going anywhere.
Seriously now, said Michelle Cottle in The New Republic Online, did anyone think Bush would ever fire Karl Rove? His guru's 'œpolitical cunning' got Bush elected to every office he's held. Besides, the president needs Rove's guidance if he is to salvage his second term. Rove, it's true, has been caught in a barefaced lie: Back in 2003, he repeatedly denied having any 'œinvolvement' in the stories revealing Plame's identity. But 'œthis administration has consistently shown itself to be completely uninterested in personal accountability—so long as the person in question has been doing the administration's bidding.' Look at the intelligence boondoggle over Iraq and the Abu Ghraib prison-abuse scandals, for which no administration official lost his job. By comparison, Rove's transgression was trifling. Was outing a CIA officer a sleazy bit of political revenge? Yes. A firing offense in 'œBushworld'? Not even close.
Nor should it be, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. In the Democratic version of this 'œpseudo scandal,' Wilson is the 'œtruth-telling' hero and Rove is the attack dog. The facts suggest the opposite. Wilson has claimed that when he was sent on his secret mission to Niger in 2002, he 'œthoroughly debunked' the notion that Saddam Hussein was trying to buy uranium there. Bush, Wilson says, ignored him. But a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report concluded that Wilson's findings in Niger were actually 'œmildly supportive' of the suspicion that Saddam was seeking uranium in Africa. It's Rove who has turned out to be the 'œreal whistle-blower,' by warning reporters 'œto be wary' of the untrustworthy Wilson.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
As for the law, said National Review Online in an editorial, it appears that Rove committed no crimes. A special prosecutor is investigating the leak of Plame's identity, but the Intelligence Identities Protection Act is 'œnarrowly worded,' limiting offenses to the deliberate disclosure of a covert operative's name. Rove never named Plame—in his conversation with a Time reporter, she was referred to only as 'œWilson's wife'—and there's no evidence he knew she was undercover. Sorry, Democrats, you'll have to search for a White House scandal elsewhere.
Richard Cohen
The Washington Post
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Russia’s Shadow FleetThe Explainer A growing number of uninsured and falsely registered vessels are entering international waters, dodging EU sanctions on Moscow’s oil and gas
-
Revisionism and division: Franco’s legacy five decades onIn The Spotlight Events to mark 50 years since Franco’s death designed to break young people’s growing fascination with the Spanish dictator
-
Did Cop30 fulfil its promise to Indigenous Brazilians?Today’s Big Question Brazilian president approves 10 new protected territories, following ‘unprecedented’ Indigenous presence at conference, both as delegates and protesters
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration