How GOP mega-donors burned the conservative base on immigration
In 2016's shadow primary, Republican donors are successfully boxing out the base on its top issue. Can they keep it up?
Republicans are angry about immigration.
A Gallup poll last year found that a small plurality of GOP voters ranked it their top issue. A more recent survey by the company found that 84 percent of Republicans were dissatisfied with the current level of immigration.
Most Americans who told Gallup they were dissatisfied with current immigration levels wanted less immigration. Only 7 percent wanted more.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Looking at the crowded Republican presidential primary field, these voters have slim pickings. Yes, even Jeb Bush is (sort of) opposed to Barack Obama's executive amnesty. But the only GOP presidential candidate actually talking about immigration reduction is Rick Santorum.
My colleague Jamie Weinstein at The Daily Caller recently reported that nearly all the major Republican candidates for the 2016 nomination either currently support a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants or have supported one in the recent past.
There's clearly a constituency for border security and lower immigration within the GOP. It's also an issue on which so many of the big-name candidates are vulnerable.
So why hasn't anybody come forward and tried to fill this void? Recent rumblings from Republican mega-donors may provide the answer.
Consider last week's conference call in which major GOP donors held up Bush as their model on immigration.
"Certainly Gov. Bush has decided to lead on this issue," the Tampa Bay Times quoted former Romney national finance chairman Spencer Zwick as saying. Zwick reportedly added that candidates must avoid saying the "most outrageous thing so that they can make national news."
"We have to have someone who is willing to take on this issue," he continued. "We have to nominate a candidate who is willing to let action be stronger than inaction. Because as Republicans, we've let inaction be our model for too long."
"[Immigrants] did not come here for anything else other than improving their lives and we need them in order to improve our economy," said billionaire GOP donor Mike Fernandez.
The first half of his statement is largely true, but the economic benefits of mass unskilled immigration are much more ambiguous.
What wasn't so ambiguous: the message that Republican presidential candidates will rail against Bush on immigration at their peril. Indeed, why risk pissing off your donors and the media at the same time?
"This call with Norquist and GOP fundraisers [is] really drawing a stark line between Republican donor class and conservative base on immigration," BuzzFeed's McKay Coppins observed.
So who will take the conservative base's side of the argument?
Oddly enough, 2012 nominee Mitt Romney was the last person to do so, for the duration of the primaries at least. By running to the right on immigration, he was able to halt Rick Perry's rapid rise and then prevent Newt Gingrich from building on his South Carolina primary victory.
Romney had the money to tell the immigration-expanding donors to buzz off. Because the donors thought of Romney as one of them and knew his issue positions were subject to change, he was able to buck them without suffering the consequences. But Romney's subsequent loss in the general election hardened the Republican donor class' conventional wisdom on immigration. Mr. Do-It-Yourself Deportations performed terribly with Latinos and even worse with Asian Americans.
Immigration doves point to the fact that two of the last three nominees agreed with the donor class on immigration. Or that Tom Tancredo's single-issue restrictionist campaign went nowhere.
There are holes in this conventional wisdom, however. John McCain didn't do much better than Romney with Latinos, despite doing much more on immigration than George W. Bush had by 2004, the year the GOP presidential ticket actually did do relatively well among Latinos. And just because Tancredo's eccentric candidacy flamed out doesn't mean a better candidate couldn't improve upon his performance. Santorum and Mike Huckabee took their social conservatism further in the primaries than Sam Brownback did.
But there is an extent to which this kind of thinking about immigration becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. A Republican who is willing to stand up to donor pressure on immigration is likely to be so monomaniacally focused on the issue as to repel voters who care about other things. Immigration attracts more politicians like Tancredo or Steve King than Barbara Jordan or even Jeff Sessions.
Nevertheless, you have to figure that some entrepreneur will eventually serve any identifiable market — unless they can't find the seed money to get off the ground.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
W. James Antle III is the politics editor of the Washington Examiner, the former editor of The American Conservative, and author of Devouring Freedom: Can Big Government Ever Be Stopped?.
-
Why more men are wearing jewellery
The Week Recommends Pop culture is boosting interest in earrings and necklaces, alongside classic tie pins and lapel pins
By Adrienne Wyper, The Week UK Published
-
7 magnificent hotels to visit before the summer crowds descend
The Week Recommends Have beach time in the Dominican Republic or a spa day in Saint-Tropez
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
The Week contest: Sheep spray
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published