Mark Halperin, Ted Cruz, and the media's double standard on identity politics
This time, there was bipartisan consensus against some repulsive questioning. But that's not always the case.


Thanks, Mark Halperin — for giving America a moment when the hypocrisy and double standards of identity politics coalesced into an undeniably embarrassing spectacle.
"I wanted to give you the opportunity to welcome your colleague Senator Sanders to the [presidential] race," Halperin told Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) after a bizarre line of questioning on the presidential candidate's Cuban heritage. "I'd like you to do it, if you would, en español." And there was just a flash of the Bloomberg journalist grinning like a kid who thinks he's gotten away with something — much like Halperin did when he called the president of the United States a "dick" on national television. Both times, Halperin's actions were as terrible and painful as they sound. And the latest case was particularly ironic for an online show titled With All Due Respect:
Thankfully, the repulsive nature of Halperin's questions provoked a bipartisan consensus of scorn. Ruben Navarette pronounced himself "nauseated" watching Cruz "be asked by a smug and clueless white journalist if [he's] authentically Cuban." Think Progress called it "a minstrel show" and "the most racist interview of a 2016 candidate." By midday Monday, Halperin apologized, and Cruz — who was a class act throughout — issued a statement accepting it and supporting Halperin.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But let's step back for a moment and acknowledge a plain truth: American politics has a love-hate relationship with identity politics. Voters love to tell themselves that the U.S. is a melting pot, an e pluribus unum community where ancestral lineage matters little in real life. They then demand that their political leaders make precisely calibrated pitches to ethnic communities, and that political parties demonstrate diversity in candidates and officeholders.
The media loves it when Democrats engage in identity politics, but get a little more critical when Republicans attempt to even the field. Ethnic and gender identity are accepted without question among Democrats, but the media routinely challenges Republicans who run, or even appear to be running, on the basis of identity.
The scrutiny of Republicans on identity always carries with it an implicit suggestion, if not outright accusation, that the claim of identity is somehow illegitimate. Joni Ernst got dismissed as an attractive nutcase. Carly Fiorina is similarly discounted for relying only on her gender identity, even though Fiorina has engaged voters and the media much more on her record than Hillary Clinton has. Clinton's use of gender politics is a core part of her candidacy — but one on which she is rarely challenged by the media.
It's hard to imagine the media demanding of a Democrat such obvious challenges to identity as Halperin attempted in the Cruz interview, insisting that Cruz reveal his favorite Cuban singer and meal, as well as testing Cruz on his knowledge of Spanish. At one point, Halperin asked if Cruz could identify "an affinity for or a connection to anything part of your Cuban past," as though Halperin couldn't quite believe that Cruz had any credible connection to his own undisputed ethnicity.
Can you imagine an interviewer taking this approach with a Democrat? Would Rep. Luis Guitierrez (D-Ill.) get grilled on what his favorite Puerto Rican dishes are and questioned on the depth of his connection to his heritage? Of course not.
This should serve as a lesson to the rest of the media. Halperin's example was only the most obvious of the double standard in the media's handling of identity politics, and an object lesson into how embarrassing the whole concept truly is. Politics should not be about group identities, but about policies, experience, competence, and integrity. Let's stick to authenticity tests on those qualities, and dispense with checkbox identity politics altogether.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Edward Morrissey has been writing about politics since 2003 in his blog, Captain's Quarters, and now writes for HotAir.com. His columns have appeared in the Washington Post, the New York Post, The New York Sun, the Washington Times, and other newspapers. Morrissey has a daily Internet talk show on politics and culture at Hot Air. Since 2004, Morrissey has had a weekend talk radio show in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area and often fills in as a guest on Salem Radio Network's nationally-syndicated shows. He lives in the Twin Cities area of Minnesota with his wife, son and daughter-in-law, and his two granddaughters. Morrissey's new book, GOING RED, will be published by Crown Forum on April 5, 2016.
-
Critics' choice: Three takes on tavern dining
Feature A second Minetta Tavern, A 1946 dining experience, and a menu with a mission
By The Week US
-
Film reviews: Warfare and A Minecraft Movie
Feature A combat film that puts us in the thick of it and five misfits fall into a cubic-world adventure
By The Week US
-
What to know before lending money to family or friends
the explainer Ensure both your relationship and your finances remain intact
By Becca Stanek, The Week US
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK