Why John Kasich was the most important person at last night's Republican debate
The Ohio governor has become a total wild card


How could it be that Ohio Gov. John Kasich was the most important person at last night's Republican presidential debate?
According to the fast-forming conventional wisdom, the longshot candidate was one of the bigger losers of the debate. But his influence on the field, already outsized, hit a fresh high.
It was Kasich's entry in the race in the first place that complicated Sen. Marco Rubio's positioning relative to Jeb Bush. Back when Bush seemed formidable — if not inevitable — Kasich's crowding of the establishment side of the field posed a real problem for Rubio. With Bush's numbers still high and Kasich carving out a small but crucial slice of the primary electorate, the senator had to tilt right without looking like a fraud.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
That took careful maneuvering, especially on immigration. But Rubio executed brilliantly. Instead of helping Bush dispatch Rubio, Kasich actually forced Rubio to elevate his game. Both men left Bush to his own fate — at first, out of political necessity. Then, however, Bush's struggle to capitalize on his advantages allowed both Rubio and Kasich to stand back as he became his own worst enemy.
That weird dynamic couldn't last forever, and it didn't. Chastened, Bush commenced with a campaign reboot, which demanded he set a stronger, surer tone at the debates. Alas, after Rubio shamed Bush onstage in October for a particularly feeble attack on his Senate attendance, last night was perhaps the beleaguered former Florida governor's last chance to show some spine.
And that's where Kasich came in, again.
Over the course of the debate, Kasich did not exactly distinguish himself — in the way his supporters might have hoped, anyway. Querulous, uneven, and sometimes downright snotty, he managed to wrap his often RINO-esque positions in the kind of exasperated contempt that plays poorly on television, especially to the older constituents who might as well slap on a bumper sticker reading, "I PRIZE SUNNY OPTIMISM — AND I VOTE!"
But none of that really mattered. With Chris Christie relegated to the undercard debate, Kasich had but one strategic objective yesterday night: to show Bush voters what a real fire in the belly looks like. Sure, he took it too far for rightwing populists, raining derision on Donald Trump and other immigration hawks. But in New Hampshire, which Bush is treating like a must-win, the Kasich we saw last night is likely to play much differently.
In a vacuum, that shouldn't be enough to knock Bush out of the race. But this primary campaign is anything but a vacuum. Bush is walking a razor-thin wire of expectations, and if he flames out in New Hampshire, finishing behind Kasich, his donors' departures will shift from a regretful trickle to a mortified stampede.
Suddenly the broader contest would shift from the two-lane dynamic Sen. Ted Cruz has been hyping — in order to cast himself as the conservative to Rubio's moderate — to a three-lane affair, with Rubio looking responsibly conservative, Kasich looking responsibly moderate, and Cruz stuck with Trump and Carson in the neither/nor category.
The Kasich we saw last night keeps the race fluid, crowded, and hard to game out. Republicans as a whole might be souring on their seasoned executive from must-win Ohio, but the man himself appears to think he's hitting his stride. With Bush falling another step behind, Kasich's confidence could make all the difference.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
James Poulos is a contributing editor at National Affairs and the author of The Art of Being Free, out January 17 from St. Martin's Press. He has written on freedom and the politics of the future for publications ranging from The Federalist to Foreign Policy and from Good to Vice. He fronts the band Night Years in Los Angeles, where he lives with his son.
-
What are the different types of nuclear weapons?
The Explainer Speculation mounts that post-war taboo on nuclear weapons could soon be shattered by use of 'battlefield' missiles
-
Floral afternoon teas to enjoy during the Chelsea Flower Show
The Week Recommends These are the prettiest spots in the city to savour a traditional treat
-
How to plan a trip along the Mississippi River
The Week Recommends See this vital waterway from the Great River Road
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy