The shameless liberal overreach on gun control
Remember that time two Islamic terrorists killed 14 people and the left only wanted to discuss guns?
 
 
Remember when the San Bernardino shooting was all about guns?
Two weeks ago, then-unknown assailants killed 14 people in a conference center in Southern California. Instead of waiting to find out who the attackers were or what they believed in, many on the left just swept up the attack into preconceived talking points.
"We must take action to stop gun violence now," Hillary Clinton tweeted. "It's time to stand up to the NRA," Martin O'Malley announced. At the same time, the tabloid New York Daily News was evidently deciding that its editorial stance was to blame white Christians for everything that's wrong with the world, starting with a cover shaming prayer, of all things.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
 
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Of course, we now know that the perpetrators were two Islamic terrorists, who had dabbled in extremist beliefs for years and might even have planned other attacks. But did that stop the left? Nope.
The tabloid next blithely called the head of the NRA a terrorist and published a bizarre op-ed blaming a victim of the San Bernardino shooting for his own murder, because, you see, he was a Christian conservative.
And, of course, there was the stunningly tone-deaf decision by The New York Times to run a gun control editorial on its front page — first time in eleventy thousand years! Need I point out that a few weeks ago terrorists in a country with gun control killed more than a hundred people? The clichéd (and, yes, tendentious) slogan "If you make guns illegal, only outlaws will have guns" has never sounded more salient.
It is, of course, important to acknowledge the sincerity of gun control advocates who believe their position would save countless lives. With that being said, if progressives want to implement laws, they are going about it in a strange, strange way.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Take the fact that both President Obama and Hillary Clinton praised Australia's mandatory gun buyback laws after the attack. That kind of policy has no hope of passing in the U.S. — but their comments did break one of the left's big taboos of gun control rhetoric (and confirmed one of the right's worst fears) by admitting that liberals don't just want restrictions on sale and use, but actually want to force people to hand over their guns.
Where did this newfound hubris on gun control come from? It can't be from progressives' success on the issue — they've made practically no legislative progress at all and public opinion is pretty much where it was a decade ago.
I think the best explanation is that the same-sex marriage movement has profoundly changed the progressive political movement. Here, after all, is a cause that everybody believed to be an absolute political non-starter just 20 years ago, but which triumphed through sheer force of argument and persuasion.
I think this experience, plus the meme (whether it is accurate or not) that demographics are inexorably creating a "Rainbow Coalition" progressive majority, is making liberals believe they can accomplish any political goal they set their mind to — as long as they shout loudly enough.
Now, the dark version of the argument goes, now we have the power to really crush conservatives.
Look, the right is not prone to its own problems. Many in the conservative movement feel, rightly or wrongly, aggrieved; they feel like the country's elites disdain them and want to use the levers of government to make them conform to their view of the world (while raiding their wallets). They believe gun control advocates think that people who like their guns, to coin a phrase, cling bitterly to them (and their religion) for irrational reasons. And so they refuse to budge one iota.
Identity is a powerful thing. Kick it out the door and it climbs back through the window. And identity politics turns important issues into excuses for beating down people who aren't like you because they scare you. All I can say is: Please cut it out, take a deep breath, and grow up.
Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry is a writer and fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. His writing has appeared at Forbes, The Atlantic, First Things, Commentary Magazine, The Daily Beast, The Federalist, Quartz, and other places. He lives in Paris with his beloved wife and daughter.
- 
 What you need to know about last-minute travel What you need to know about last-minute travelThe Week Recommends You can book an awesome trip with a moment’s notice 
- 
 Saudi Arabia could become an AI focal point Saudi Arabia could become an AI focal pointUnder the Radar A state-backed AI project hopes to rival China and the United States 
- 
 Crossword: October 29, 2025 Crossword: October 29, 2025The Week's daily crossword 
- 
 Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ rallies Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June 
- 
 Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardon Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein 
- 
 The last words and final moments of 40 presidents The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't 
- 
 The JFK files: the truth at last? The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration 
- 
 'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump? 'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred 
- 
 Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off? Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook 
- 
 Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing? Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration 
- 
 US election: where things stand with one week to go US election: where things stand with one week to goThe Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic' 
