Why Ted Cruz's victory in Iowa is meaningless
The Texas senator scored a big win in Iowa. But he's still not going to be the GOP nominee.
The conventional wisdom got set in stone long before all the GOP's votes had been counted in Iowa Monday night: Donald Trump fell flat on his face. Marco Rubio bounded to the head of the mainstream Republican pack. And Ted Cruz blew it out of the water with a strong first-place showing.
I'll give Trump his humiliation and Rubio his glory. But Cruz? I'm sorry, but no laurels for him. He remains a deeply unattractive candidate with very little mainstream appeal. He's hated by just about every elected member of his party. His positions on the issues place him on the GOP's far-right flank. And on the stump he manages to come off as a shrill, self-aggrandizing, sanctimonious phony.
But wait — doesn't Cruz's victory in Iowa belie everything I just said? He showed he's a winner!
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
No, he didn't. He showed he's a winner in Iowa. Just as Mike Huckabee did in 2008, and Rick Santorum in 2012. Did anyone consider them frontrunners for the nomination heading into New Hampshire? Of course not, because they weren't. Huckabee went on to carry eight states, while Santorum carried 11. Not bad. But not even close to cinching the nomination.
Will Cruz do as well? It's hard to say, since the polls will shift somewhat coming out of Iowa. But at the moment, Cruz is running a distant second to Trump in New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada — and that's without factoring in the surge of energy and momentum (and spike in money and endorsements) the Rubio campaign is going to experience over the next week.
Let's say it quickly becomes a three-man race. In that case, Cruz might carry some states — a few in the South, including his home state of Texas, perhaps some others in the Midwest. The most conservatives states, in other words, and certainly not the big, delegate-rich states of California, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Michigan, and New Jersey.
That would be a decent, respectable showing — a Huckabee- or Santorum-level showing. But it wouldn't make Cruz the nominee. It would make him the far-right-wing candidate he's always been.
Those are the kinds of candidates Iowa Republicans have preferred in the post-George W. Bush era. In 2012, the combination of Santorum, Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich, and Michele Bachmann won 64 percent of the vote in the Iowa caucuses. Last night, Cruz, Trump, Ben Carson, Huckabee, and Santorum together won…64 percent of the vote.
Just under two-thirds of Iowa Republicans appear to be attracted to candidates who are exceedingly unlikely to appeal to large numbers of voters in most of the rest of the country. That's largely a function of the fact that a high percentage of Iowa Republicans are religious conservatives, and evangelical Protestants in particular.
Does it make any sense that such an ideologically marginal (and extreme) state votes first in the presidential election cycle every time? None whatsoever.
But short of upending the post-1972 tradition of starting the voting with Iowa, we can at least view the results of the Iowa caucuses with the skepticism they deserve.
Ted Cruz won Iowa. But the victory means much less than it seems.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Damon Linker is a senior correspondent at TheWeek.com. He is also a former contributing editor at The New Republic and the author of The Theocons and The Religious Test.
-
The lab-made meat that 'could kill the EU'
Under The Radar Concerned at 'unintended consequences for farming' some farmers are 'turning rabid' over the rise of cultured meat
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Magazine solutions - August 2, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - August 2, 2024
By The Week Staff Published
-
Magazine printables - August 2, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - August 2, 2024
By The Week Staff Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Supreme Court rejects challenge to CFPB
Speed Read The court rejected a conservative-backed challenge to the way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published