Elizabeth Warren still plans to make heads roll over the financial crisis
The Massachusetts senator is playing the long game
It's been eight years since the financial crisis, but some wounds remain unhealed: Among them, the Obama administration's almost total failure to prosecute senior Wall Street executives for the criminal activities that helped precipitate the collapse. On Thursday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) put law enforcement on notice that she's not prepared to let the issue die.
Warren wrote two letters. The first, to the inspector general of the Department of Justice, is long but pretty straightforward: She wants the inspector general to investigate the decision-making process by which the department chose not to prosecute so many potential cases. Specifically, Warren wants to know what happened to the recommendations of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC), a 10-person investigative body that Congress put together in 2009 to understand how the financial crisis and resulting economic collapse happened. The commission provided the Justice Department with an enormous pile of evidence in 2011, but it had no formal power beyond referring possible cases of wrongdoing.
That documentation was only opened up to the public in March of this year. Warren says her staff combed through the material, and found 11 referrals implicating nine individuals in "serious indications of violation[s]' of federals securities or other laws." They include the then-CEOs and CFOs of Fannie Mae, AIG, Merrill Lynch, and Citigroup.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"The DOJ has not filed any criminal prosecutions against any of the nine individuals," Warren wrote. "Not one of the nine has gone to prison or been convicted of a criminal offense. Not a single one has even been indicted or brought to trial."
Warren's staff also found potentially illegal activity across 14 different corporations. And again, no one was indicted or tried for this, though Warren notes that five of the 14 settled cases with the DOJ and paid fines.
That last part is especially significant.
Ultimately, the financial crisis was pretty straightforward: A newly deregulated financial sector engineered a bunch of fancy financial products that allowed huge amounts of garbage mortgages to be passed off as perfectly safe investments. As a result, churning out lots of garbage mortgages became a very profitable enterprise. So huge numbers of less fortunate Americans and homeowners were defrauded and deceived into taking on credit they could never repay, in order to feed that supply of garbage mortgages. This all continued until the bubble popped and the whole thing came crashing down.
The questions then become: How high up the chain of command did this deception go? Were the people in charge of the banks and the financial firms knowingly deceiving investors with these financial products? Or was the financial engineering so good it fooled Wall Street itself?
For a long time, the explanation for why then-attorney general Eric Holder and the rest of the Justice Department didn't attempt more prosecutions was that a lot of the possible culprits were thought to be merely stupid, not criminal. But as John Cassidy wrote at The New Yorker a while back, that logic has been more or less blown up by the massive settlements several major banks reached with government prosecutors. Bank of America paid $8.5 billion to settle charges against Merrill Lynch and Countrywide Financial — which it's owned since the crisis — and JPMorgan Chase paid $13 billion.
Critically, the settlements involved mounds of documentation and statements by key players in the firms, all of which made it pretty clear that people up and down the chain of command knew and understood what was going on. That didn't sound like stupidity or even negligence, Cassidy observed. "It sounds a lot like securities fraud, which is a criminal offense."
The more disturbing explanation for the Justice Department's reticence emerged later, when Holder and Lanny Breuer — another senior DOJ staffer at the time — effectively admitted they didn't go after major Wall Street executives for fear of creating even more financial panic and damaging the economy further. Basically, they decided Wall Street banks were too big to prosecute.
Which brings me to Warren's second letter, to FBI Director James Comey.
While this one is shorter, it might be even shrewder. Warren wants the FBI to release all the documents relating to its own investigations into the FCIC's referrals. Normally, the FBI stays mum on cases the Justice Department decides not to take on. But Warren noted that Comey himself broke that precedent when he went into great public detail explaining why the FBI would not recommend that Hillary Clinton be prosecuted following the investigation into her email server. Comey said he thought that course of action was called for, because of "intense public interest" in the matter.
In what's probably the mother of all understatements, Warren noted that standard applies to prosecutions for the financial crisis.
Basically, Warren is trying to use the new precedent Comey created to force the conversation about which Wall Street executives could have been prosecuted — and why they weren't — out into the open. That Warren's doing it with a case involving Clinton is especially ironic, since the conversation would be starting just as a new president — presumably Clinton — is entering office. And if it's Clinton, the Democrats may well also retake the Senate, giving Warren even more clout. Warren may be a supporter of the Democratic nominee, but she's pretty clearly also willing to put Clinton on the spot.
However, Warren is also running out of time: The statute of limitations for these prosecutions is 10 years. But while Wall Street has long since recovered from the crash, the economy is still just limping into recovery eight years later. Millions of jobs, livelihoods, and families were destroyed. The Obama administration failed almost totally to help American homeowners strung up by Wall Street malfeasance, and Congress completely botched the job of making American workers whole. Meanwhile, Wall Street bigshots got to skate.
Just because some wounds are old, doesn't meant they don't hurt.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Jeff Spross was the economics and business correspondent at TheWeek.com. He was previously a reporter at ThinkProgress.
-
Raise your glass at these 7 hotel bars where the vibe is as important as the drinking
The Week Recommends Have a pisco sour in Peru and a Bellini in Rome. Or maybe run into Bruno Mars in Vegas.
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
'The burden of the tariff would be regressive'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Should Sonia Sotomayor retire from the Supreme Court?
Talking Points Democrats worry about repeating the history of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published