3 glaring problems with Donald Trump's defense of his tax returns
"It's clear he was a spectacularly disastrous businessman"
The most remarkable thing about Donald Trump's official response to the New York Times report that he claimed a $916 million loss in his 1995 tax returns and could have thus avoided paying federal income tax for 18 years might be that he didn't deny the allegation.
Instead, the short statement from the Trump campaign complained that Trump's New York State personal returns were "illegally obtained" (they were sent to a Times reporter in an envelope postmarked from Trump Tower), accused Hillary Clinton of breaking the law, then said "Mr. Trump is a highly-skilled businessman who has a fiduciary responsibility to his business, his family, and his employees to pay no more tax than legally required."
There are some big, glaring problems with this defense. Let's look at three of them.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
1. Whether Trump meant his "fiduciary responsibility" legally or in any other sense, that claim is ludicrous, University of Chicago Law professor Daniel Hemel writes at Medium. "First, any obligation that Donald Trump might have to minimize his companies' taxes would not translate into an obligation to minimize his personal taxes," and the Times obtained his personal tax returns. Trump is also the 100 percent owner of his enterprises, and so "Trump has no fiduciary responsibility to himself," or his employees (even if he should).
2. The idea that Trump is a "highly skilled businessman" who lost almost a billion dollars during an upturn in the real estate market doesn't make sense. "It's either a unique combination of bad luck or he's a terrible businessman or both," former Congressional Budget Office director Douglas Holtz-Eakin, now at a conservative think tank, tells The New York Times. "I don't understand how you can lose a billion dollars and stay in business." Steven Rosenthal, a real estate tax specialist at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, was more blunt: "It's clear he was a spectacularly disastrous businessman."
3. The Trump campaign statement also asserts that "Mr. Trump knows the tax code far better than anyone who has ever run for president and he is the only one that knows how to fix it." Trump's tax plans, however, would not fix the gaping loopholes he could have used to avoid paying taxes for 18 years. "He hasn’t proposed anything to address these loopholes," Holtz-Eakins said. "Hillary Clinton is proposing tax code changes that would cost her and her family money," says Washington Post business columnist Allan Sloan. "Trump, by contrast, is proposing tax changes that would greatly benefit the commercial real estate business, which is his primary field, and would greatly benefit his own family."
Trump campaign advocates fanned out to the Sunday talk shows to argue that Trump was smart to avoid paying taxes — former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani repeatedly called Trump a "genius" — but "if Trump were truly smart — and wanted to lead by example," says Sloan, "he would have disclosed his tax returns, showed the loopholes he used, and vowed to close them."
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
'Voters know Biden and Trump all too well'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Is the Gaza war tearing US university campuses apart?
Today's Big Question Protests at Columbia University, other institutions, pit free speech against student safety
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
DOJ settles with Nassar victims for $138M
Speed Read The settlement includes 139 sexual abuse victims of the former USA Gymnastics doctor
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published