Donald Trump vs. America's automakers
There's no denying that automakers are feeling the heat from the president-elect's criticism
The smartest insight and analysis, from all perspectives, rounded up from around the web:
Car companies are desperate to get on the good side of the president-elect, said Bernie Woodall and David Shepardson at Reuters. For months, Donald Trump has threatened to slap big tariffs on cars built in Mexico and has scolded U.S. automakers — sometimes inaccurately — for not building more cars domestically. All that criticism appears to be sinking in. Fiat Chrysler said this week that it will invest $1 billion in two Midwestern plants and create 2,000 U.S. jobs; Ford announced last week that it would scrap plans to build a $1.6 billion plant in Mexico and instead invest $700 million to upgrade one of its Michigan plants, hiring 700 workers in the process. Although "both companies have said they made the decision for business reasons and not because of pressure from Trump," there's no denying that automakers are feeling the heat. Talk of Trump's arm-twisting is dominating this week's Detroit Auto Show, said Bill Vlasic and Neal Boudette at The New York Times. With a few admonishing tweets, the president-elect "has changed the focus of the show from what new vehicles are on display to where they are made."
Automakers certainly aren't relishing the attention, said Jamie Butters and David Welch at Bloomberg. Building more cars in Mexico has been a key strategy in recent years, especially when it comes to small cars made for overseas customers. Beyond that, automakers crave predictability "in an industry where billion-dollar factories take years to build and some products hardly change over a half decade." Forecasting "fickle consumer tastes" is difficult in the best of times; the floor at this year's Detroit Auto Show, for instance, is filled with fuel-efficient passenger cars and sleek electric coupes, even though American drivers are once again flocking to gas-guzzling SUVs. Automakers committed to the environmentally friendly models five years ago when gas was $3.60 a gallon. Now it's beginning to dawn on executives that "divining the future will only get tougher under President Donald Trump."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"The political dance going on between Donald Trump and Detroit actually has a lot of upside for Detroit," said Holman W. Jenkins Jr. at The Wall Street Journal. Automakers desperately want relief from the Obama administration's "onerous" fuel-efficiency mandates, which companies are trying to meet with as little expense as possible. Trump's transition team, meanwhile, is sending "strong signals" that automakers will see regulatory burdens relaxed, provided Detroit goes along with the president-elect's jobs agenda. This game of quid pro quo "is a lot more conventional than it appears." What's striking is the "paltry" number of jobs actually involved in these moves, said Nicholas Clairmont at The Atlantic. Trump has already taken credit on Twitter for Ford's and Chrysler's recent announcements; never mind that those decisions were probably underway well before he was even elected. But ultimately we're talking about roughly 3,000 new jobs so far, about the same number the U.S. economy added "in one-third of one average day of August 2016, a strongish month for the recovery." More worrisome? That American companies feel they have to "curry favor with the president-elect" at all in order to conduct business.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Starbucks workers are planning their ‘biggest strike’ everThe Explainer The union said 92% of its members voted to strike
-
‘These wouldn’t be playgrounds for billionaires’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
The 5 best nuclear war movies of all timeThe Week Recommends ‘A House of Dynamite’ reanimates a dormant cinematic genre for our new age of atomic insecurity
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration