What Tom Price's bobbing and weaving reveals about Trump's health care plan
When a nominee refuses to answer a simple question, it's probably because the real answer is going to be very unpopular

Confirmation hearings almost never produce the bombshell moment we sometimes seem to be expecting. Nevertheless, they can still be illuminating if you pay close enough attention, even when the nominees bob and weave to try to avoid saying anything controversial or contradicting their future boss. The latter is particularly difficult for Donald Trump's picks to head Cabinet departments, since the positions he takes change from day to day, and in some cases are in direct opposition to what Republicans plan to do.
So when Tom Price began his confirmation hearings on Wednesday to be secretary of health and human services, he probably knew he was going to get some questions that wouldn't be easy to answer. Price is a smooth politician and so he didn't get flustered, but he did offer a demonstration of what kinds of questions Republicans are nervous about when it comes to health care, particularly their plan to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
Here's a clue as you watch these hearings: If a nominee is confronted with something Trump has said and they disagree, then whatever it is Trump is pledging isn't going to happen and they don't care who knows it. But if they try to wiggle their way out of answering, that probably means that it isn't going to happen, but they'd prefer people not know it.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
For instance, in recent days Trump has given interviews to a number of news organizations in which he claims to be in the final stages of formulating his own health care plan, one that includes universal coverage and negotiations with drug companies over prices. Both these items not only appear nowhere in any Republican health care plan, they are absolutely anathema to conservatives. But writing in the National Review, conservative policy expert Yuval Levin says that his colleagues aren't that worried. "After Trump's Washington Post interview this past Sunday, the conservative health-care universe, including some people on Trump's own team, quickly concluded that the separate administration plan he described was entirely a figment of Trump's imagination."
I had assumed the same thing, but it's rather bracing to see someone on the right admit it so straightforwardly. Levin also suggests that Republicans should see Trump "as a kind of empowered one-man focus group of cable news viewers," whose utterances may be meaningless as a policy matter, but who can provide them insight into what the masses might find appealing at any particular moment.
That doesn't mean they'll follow his impulses, momentary or not. And so when Tom Price was asked by Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) whether he agreed with Trump on negotiating drug prices, he couldn't quite say no, but he sure wasn't going to say yes. (Instead he said, "I think we need to find solutions to the challenges of folks gaining access to needed medication.") Similarly, when Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) confronted him with a pledge Trump had made during the campaign that no funds would be cut from Medicare or Medicaid — cuts Republicans in general and Price in particular are itching to carry out — he tried to shift attention, saying, "Senator, I believe that the metric ought to be the care the patients are receiving." Her attempt at getting him to offer a yes or no on cuts was unsuccessful, even as everyone knew that the real answer is yes, Republicans intend to cut Medicare and Medicaid.
Here's another important clue: When a nominee refuses to answer a simple question, it's probably because the real answer is going to be very unpopular.
And that's the dilemma Republicans are in right now on ObamaCare. Their repeal and replace plan — at least judging by the plans Price and others have put forward in the past — are driven by one primary goal: getting government as far away from health care as possible. Trouble is, that's a goal most Americans don't share. They've got other priorities. And the Republican plans would give them everything they don't want: more people without insurance, higher out-of-pocket costs, more complexity, and less security.
That, needless to say, is going to be a pretty hard sell. Which is why, according to CNN, the Trump team excluded Price from the planning for their "plan" (in whatever form it exists) because "the incoming administration wants Price to be inoculated from questions about what Trump's alternative to the Affordable Care Act looks like when he faces probing senators this week." Such a clever gambit!
But they're going to have to answer questions about it eventually. That's when the real trouble starts.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Paul Waldman is a senior writer with The American Prospect magazine and a blogger for The Washington Post. His writing has appeared in dozens of newspapers, magazines, and web sites, and he is the author or co-author of four books on media and politics.
-
How Canadian tariffs could impact tourism to the US
In the Spotlight Canadians represent the largest group of foreign visitors to the United States. But they may soon stop visiting.
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Entitlements: DOGE goes after Social Security
Feature Elon Musk is pushing false claims about Social Security fraud
By The Week US Published
-
The Week contest: Amazon Bond
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published