These are the bald-faced lies Republicans are telling about health care
What a disaster
House Republicans are supposed to vote on the American Health Care Act today. If they pass it, they will confirm just about every nasty thing that can be said about them. They will have proven that Republicans never took health-care policy seriously, never meant a word they said about repealing ObamaCare, and are too uncoordinated to back away from certain disaster.
This health-care bill is a set of lies all the way down.
The first lie is that this is a "repeal of ObamaCare." The House Republican plan leaves in place the regulations of insurance companies, like the ones that protect people with pre-existing conditions and keep kids on their parents' health-care plans well into adulthood. It keeps the expansion of Medicaid in place, though it does deprive it of funds.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The second lie is that it's even a health-care bill at all. It's really more of a fiscal bill. The Medicaid cuts and tax cuts for high earners are almost perfectly matched dollar-for-dollar in the Ryan bill. Almost $900 billion in health-care-benefit cuts would, after this bill, become almost $900 billion in tax relief, mostly for high earners. Taxes would also be cut on medical device makers, and other health-care related entities.
There are only two words that matter in American health-care reform: cheaper and simpler. The U.S. pays more for health care than any other country on Earth, while delivering less impressive results. And our health-care system is a worse bureaucratic mess than any other, with far more byzantine sets of third-party negotiators and payers. The Republicans have no plausible story about how their plan would lower health-care costs for insurers and end users, or make acquiring and maintaining health insurance simpler. In fact, the opposite. Health-care coverage would almost certainly become more expensive for seniors under the Republican plan.
Why are Republicans pressing forward with this? Just 17 percent of voters think the GOP is handling the health-care bill well, while 43 percent believe the Republicans should slow down before upending America's health-care system.
Partly it is just inertia. The GOP wants to keep faith with its seven-year promise to repeal and replace ObamaCare. They seem not to have noticed that their own president was elected by promising almost the exact opposite. Trump praised universal coverage and won. This made no impression on Congress, however — and evidently a scant impression on the president, too.
Maybe the worst lie is the self-delusion involved in Republican health-care reform. The Paul Ryans of the world seem not to have noticed that they had spent seven years rooting hard for the Supreme Court to obviate their need to repeal and replace ObamaCare. If there was such great political benefit to junking the law, why root for the Court to deprive you of the pleasure and political windfall of doing it yourself? Obviously, the repeal and replace rhetoric was just boob bait. But Republicans don't have enough sense to back down. What is it about hopeless wars of choice that Republicans can't resist?
As embarrassing as it would be for their first big legislative push to fail, Republicans really would be better off. This party no longer knows what it believes about entitlement reform or health care and it shouldn't pretend to know. After watching Obama's reforms blow up in his face merely for causing some health-insurance policies to be canceled, the GOP should know that passing a law that will disrupt the coverage of millions will be political suicide.
It's time for the GOP to take a time-out on this fiasco and focus their energy on Trump's more populist agenda: immigration, infrastructure, and trade.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Michael Brendan Dougherty is senior correspondent at TheWeek.com. He is the founder and editor of The Slurve, a newsletter about baseball. His work has appeared in The New York Times Magazine, ESPN Magazine, Slate and The American Conservative.
-
The Nutcracker: English National Ballet's reboot restores 'festive sparkle'
The Week Recommends Long-overdue revamp of Tchaikovsky's ballet is 'fun, cohesive and astoundingly pretty'
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
Congress reaches spending deal to avert shutdown
Speed Read The bill would fund the government through March 14, 2025
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - December 18, 2024
Cartoons Wednesday's cartoons - thoughts and prayers, pound of flesh, and more
By The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published