Democrats built a health-care jalopy. But it's Republicans who are about to drive it off a cliff.
It's pretty clear who to blame when it explodes


The immense, wobbling Jenga tower that is the American health-care system has gotten a few more jostles lately. There are more problems with some ObamaCare exchanges, with more insurers withdrawing from the marketplace. Some locations now have only one or two options on their exchange — while a few have none at all. Other insurers are planning gigantic premium increases.
What's the problem? Some of the insurance markets are troubled by greater than expected costs and low enrollment. Others are worried by Trump's erratic threats to remove insurer subsidies, as my colleague Jeff Spross explains. Still more are concerned about the very prospect of TrumpCare, which is before the Senate and could do untold damage to the delicate exchange system if it becomes law.
But one thing is clear: Whatever happens to American health care, it is now Republicans' fault. If American want better health care, they must vote against the GOP — and not just in favor of any Democrats, but ones who support Medicare for all.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Of course, Democrats are responsible in many ways for setting up these problems. If it weren't for Joe Lieberman (and other treacherous centrist Democrats), there would be a public option as a backstop for places without any private exchange insurers. But as Ezra Klein pointed out in 2009, Lieberman (hilariously, now up to replace James Comey as FBI director under President Trump) demanded no public option as his price for voting for ObamaCare, so he could get back at the liberals who primaried him in 2006. I hope the harvest of sick and dead people is sufficiently large to satisfy him.
But the fact that Democrats are the author of some problems has nothing to do with the ability of Republicans to fix those problems. The GOP has control of the House, the Senate, and the White House. The filibuster is an obstacle only insofar as Senate Republicans allow it to be. They could abolish it at a stroke, with a party-line vote — or simply replace the parliamentarian with one that will approve the rules they want, which they have done before. Indeed, if they had a credible proposal to actually improve ObamaCare, they could probably peel off enough Democrats to pass it.
And they may well pass something! But when we look at Republican health policy proposals, it is obvious they have no intention whatsoever of fixing the problems with American health care. On the contrary, they are going to make them all worse. ObamaCare subsidies will be slashed and coverage requirements will be cored out in many states — cheaper premiums in some places for some people, but at the cost of skyrocketing deductibles and less treatment covered. And Medicaid will be slowly strangled to death. It's a disaster for all but the very rich.
This brings me back to the Democrats. Virtually no one wants TrumpCare. But many people are understandably rather skeptical of Democrats when it comes to insuring every single person. To this day there are still 28 million people uninsured, and a lot of the coverage on the ObamaCare exchanges is lousy, with sky-high deductibles and massive out-of-network bills. It's better than the previous status quo, but it's a long way from true universal coverage.
During the negotiations in 2009, ObamaCare was viewed as a sort of permanent compromise between the left-wing dream of universal health care, and the fact that private insurers and medical providers have sunk deep roots in the country (including into many Democratic members of Congress). With a hybrid system, we could cover everyone without having to delete the entire private insurance industry. It was a (theoretically) universal system that could accommodate conservative market ideology.
It's clear now that idea was totally mistaken. The compromise did not ever take hold; Republicans hysterically demonized ObamaCare as something akin to the Great Leap Forward or the Holodomor from the moment it was proposed. And now that they have taken power, they move to not just scrap most of ObamaCare, but actually worsen coverage as compared to the pre-ObamaCare status quo. The only disagreement is about how much worse it will be.
So Americans who want everyone to have insurance — not to mention an end to the infuriating paperwork, the impossible deductibles and co-pays, and the bankrupting medical bills — must demand Democratic candidates that will vote through Medicare for all. Meanwhile, Democrats must realize that if they are to keep power after winning another election, they must ram through fundamental, brute-force reform — one that will quickly and easily hand people simple coverage that is unequivocally better than what they have.
Tinkering around the edge of the American health-care monstrosity is not going to cut it this time.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
Road trip: New England’s maple syrup season
Feature New England is serving up maple syrup in delicious and unexpected ways
By The Week US Published
-
Music Reviews: Mdou Moctar, Panda Bear, and Tate McRae
Feature “Tears of Injustice,” “Sinister Grift,” and “So Close to What”
By The Week US Published
-
What's at stake in the Mahmoud Khalil deportation fight?
Talking Points Vague accusations and First Amendment concerns
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published