U.S. v. Skrmetti: Did the trans rights movement overreach?

The Supreme Court upholds a Tennessee law that bans transgender care for minors, dealing a blow to trans rights

A rally for trans youth at a Washington church
The court has done "untold harm," as Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissent, "to transgender children and the parents and families who love them."
(Image credit: Reuters)

What the Supreme Court just did to transgender people "will live in infamy," said Elie Mystal in The Nation. In a 6-3 decision along ideological lines, the justices last month upheld a Tennessee law that bans minors from using hormones and puberty blockers for gender transition. The plaintiffs in U.S. v. Skrmetti, backed by the American Civil Liberties Union, argued that the law discriminates illegally on the basis of sex, because it lets a late-developing teenage "boy" take testosterone but prohibits the same treatment for a trans teen deemed a "girl" at birth. The courts' conservatives were having none of it. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts dusted off one of "the oldest legal tricks" in the bigot's playbook, explaining that the law can't be discriminatory because it bans gender dysphoria treatment for all minors, trans or cis. Similar reasoning was "used to justify Jim Crow laws" on Black and white intermarriage, said Mark Joseph Stern in Slate. How depressing, in 2025, to see this "brittle logic" used against another disfavored minority. With laws similar to Tennessee's on the books in 26 other states, the court has done "untold harm," as Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissent, "to transgender children and the parents and families who love them."

Sorry, progressives, but "reality isn't unconstitutional," said Dan McLaughlin in National Review. Males and females are biologically different, and no one cries "bigotry!" when the FDA approves a breast cancer drug for use in women but not in men. As Roberts patiently explains, there's nothing in law to stop a state from approving some "medical uses" of a drug while denying others. And Tennessee has good reason to protect its children from drugs that can irreversibly damage their fertility and sexual function. This is more about culture than law, said M. Gessen in The New York Times. Skrmetti is part of a "vast backlash against trans rights" that has been building for years, and that extends "far beyond the conservative Supreme Court or the borders of the MAGA universe." In last year's election, Donald Trump's "Kamala's for they/them" ad turned some moderate voters against Kamala Harris, and many Democrats are now fretting that they went "too far" on trans rights. Exactly how is not clear: By helping young people who are tormented by their bodies find peace?

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up