U.S. v. Skrmetti: Did the trans rights movement overreach?
The Supreme Court upholds a Tennessee law that bans transgender care for minors, dealing a blow to trans rights

What the Supreme Court just did to transgender people "will live in infamy," said Elie Mystal in The Nation. In a 6-3 decision along ideological lines, the justices last month upheld a Tennessee law that bans minors from using hormones and puberty blockers for gender transition. The plaintiffs in U.S. v. Skrmetti, backed by the American Civil Liberties Union, argued that the law discriminates illegally on the basis of sex, because it lets a late-developing teenage "boy" take testosterone but prohibits the same treatment for a trans teen deemed a "girl" at birth. The courts' conservatives were having none of it. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts dusted off one of "the oldest legal tricks" in the bigot's playbook, explaining that the law can't be discriminatory because it bans gender dysphoria treatment for all minors, trans or cis. Similar reasoning was "used to justify Jim Crow laws" on Black and white intermarriage, said Mark Joseph Stern in Slate. How depressing, in 2025, to see this "brittle logic" used against another disfavored minority. With laws similar to Tennessee's on the books in 26 other states, the court has done "untold harm," as Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissent, "to transgender children and the parents and families who love them."
Sorry, progressives, but "reality isn't unconstitutional," said Dan McLaughlin in National Review. Males and females are biologically different, and no one cries "bigotry!" when the FDA approves a breast cancer drug for use in women but not in men. As Roberts patiently explains, there's nothing in law to stop a state from approving some "medical uses" of a drug while denying others. And Tennessee has good reason to protect its children from drugs that can irreversibly damage their fertility and sexual function. This is more about culture than law, said M. Gessen in The New York Times. Skrmetti is part of a "vast backlash against trans rights" that has been building for years, and that extends "far beyond the conservative Supreme Court or the borders of the MAGA universe." In last year's election, Donald Trump's "Kamala's for they/them" ad turned some moderate voters against Kamala Harris, and many Democrats are now fretting that they went "too far" on trans rights. Exactly how is not clear: By helping young people who are tormented by their bodies find peace?
"Backlash is a risk with any social change," said Megan McArdle in The Washington Post. That's why most civil rights movements adopt an "incrementalist strategy," picking legal "fights they think they can win" while doing the slower, more important work of securing public support. In Skrmetti, conversely, trans advocates decided to "go for broke," hoping a conservative court would sign off on sex changes for under-18s even though 56% of Americans support bans on such treatments. Skrmetti was the brainchild of ACLU lawyer Chase Strangio, said Andrew Sullivan in his Substack newsletter, a trans man whose stated goal is to uproot the whole notion of sex differences. He argues that gay men like me should never have fought for marriage equality, because marriage is a fundamentally violent institution, and that "a penis is not a male body part. It's just an unusual body part for a woman." Such extremism has pushed the gay and lesbian rights movement "onto thin political ice": Republican support for same-sex marriage has dropped from 55% in 2022 to 41% today. The Supreme Court's ruling to "protect vulnerable children" should force the movement to "right the ship," and work to "regain the broader public trust we have recently lost."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Miami Freedom Tower’s MAGA library squeeze
THE EXPLAINER Plans to place Donald Trump’s presidential library next to an iconic symbol of Florida’s Cuban immigrant community has South Florida divided
-
Trump wants to revive coal. Will it work?
Talking Points Wind, solar and natural gas are ascendant
-
Is the first AI ‘actor’ the beginning of Hollywood’s existential crisis?
Today's Big Question 'Tilly Norwood' sparks a backlash
-
Shutdown: Democrats stand firm, at a cost
Feature With Trump refusing to negotiate, Democrats’ fight over health care could push the government toward a shutdown
-
TikTok: A little help from Trump’s friends
Feature Trump’s new TikTok deal would hand the app over to 'his billionaire allies,' ignoring national security concerns
-
Antifa: A useful right-wing bogeyman?
Feature Trump signs executive order labeling antifa a “domestic terrorist” group
-
King Bibi's profound changes to the Middle East
Feature Over three decades, Benjamin Netanyahu has profoundly changed both Israel and the Middle East.
-
Trump promotes an unproven Tylenol-autism link
Feature Trump gave baseless advice to pregnant women, claiming Tylenol causes autism in children
-
Trump: Demanding the prosecution of his political foes
Feature Trump orders Pam Bondi to ‘act fast’ and prosecute James Comey, Letitia James, and Adam Schiff
-
Ukraine: Trump’s latest stalling tactic
Feature Trump plans to impose sanctions on Russia only if all 31 NATO states join in and agree to ban Russian oil imports
-
Supreme Court to consider gutting agency autonomy
Speed Read The court’s three liberals dissented